IJCNIS Vol. 18, No. 4, 8 Aug. 2026
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 1316KB)
PDF (1316KB), PP.150-168
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
AUV-assisted underwater sensor networks, Spider Wasp Optimizer, Self-Guided Deep Clustering Network (SGDCN), Kepler’s Optimization (KO), Fuzzy Self-Guided Structure Retention Generative Adversarial Network (FS-GAN)
In recent years, AUV-assisted underwater sensor networks (AUV-UWSNs) have gained significant attention due to their ability to monitor and collect crucial data from the oceanic environment. However, efficiency of these networks has hindered certain issues which include energy consumption problems, low communication range and rational routing/ clustering problems. Two of the major challenges affecting other aspects of AUV-UWSNs are the lack of a proper way to choose the right cluster heads and guarantee sound data transmission. This paper proposes a high-efficiency clustered routing technique that tackles these problems by utilizing the Spider Wasp Optimizer (SWO) for optimal cluster head selection and the Deep Fuzzy Gorilla Troops Self-Guided Generative Adversarial Clustering Network (DFGTS-2GACN) for efficient data transmission. The SWO enhances the choice of cluster heads with respect to energy consumption and the DFGTS-2GACN applies deep learning and fuzzy logic control to facilitate data forwarding in the network with enhanced performance. Experimental performance shows 99% improvement compared with the existing methods. In this paper, an effective method to consider for increasing the data transfer rate while decreasing the energy consumption plus increasing the life cycle of the underwater network facilitated by the AUV in the underwater sensor networks is discussed, thus providing a viable solution to the problems of underwater communication.
Kodukulla Aruna Gayatri, Amanullah, S. A. Kalaiselvan, "Energy-Efficient Clustering and Routing Protocol Using GAN-Based Fuzzy Clustering for AUV-Assisted UWSNs", International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security(IJCNIS), Vol.18, No.4, pp. 150-168, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijcnis.2026.04.08
[1]Z. Shen and H. Yin, “A Distributed Routing-Aware Deployment Algorithm for Underwater Sensor Networks,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 20040–20053, 2024.
[2]Y. Wang, S. Song, J. Liu, X. Guo, and J. Cui, “Efficient AUVs-Aided Localization for Large-Scale Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 19, pp. 31776–31790, 2024.
[3]Y. Ding, J. Xu, G. Xie, G. Li, J. Wang, Y. Ren. Advanced Framework for Underwater Node Repair via Multi-AUV Based on Multi-Agent Offline Reinforcement Learning.
[4]Y. Li, H. Huang, Y. Zhuang, Z. Chen, X. Wang, and X. Xu, “Multi-AUV Collaborative Data Collection Scheme to Clustering and Routing for Heterogeneous UWSNs,” IEEE Sens. J. p. 1, 2024.
[5]G. Kasparavičiūtė, K. Fagerholt, and M. Ludvigsen, “Energy-efficient route planning for optimizing underwater pipeline inspections using Resident Autonomous Underwater Vehicles,” Ocean Eng., vol. 315, p. 119756, 2025.
[6]B. Saemi and F. Goodarzian, “Energy-efficient routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks using a hybrid metaheuristic algorithm,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 133, p. 108132, 2024.
[7]C. Lin, G. Han, C. Lu, S. B. Shah, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, “How to Perform Energy-Balanced Underwater Data Collection in AUV-Aided UASNs: A Social Welfare-Based Node Clustering Approach,” IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. pp. 1–13, 2024.
[8]Z. Zhang, J. Xu, G. Xie, J. Wang, Z. Han, and Y. Ren, “Environment and Energy-Aware AUV-Assisted Data Collection for the Internet of Underwater Things,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 15, pp. 26406–26418, 2024.
[9]Z. Wang, J. Du, C. Jiang, Z. Zhang, Y. Ren, and Z. Han, “Dynamic Packet Routing Based on Acoustic Signal Curve Propagation in the AUV-Assisted IoUT,” IEEE Internet Things J., 2023.
[10]H. Gul, G. Ullah, M. Khan, and Y. Khan, “EERBCR: Energy-efficient regional based cooperative routing protocol for underwater sensor networks with sink mobility,” J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1–3, 2023.
[11]Z. Wang, Z. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Jiang, W. Wei, and Y. Ren, “AUV-assisted node repair for IoUT relying on multi-agent reinforcement learning,” IEEE Internet Things J., 2023.
[12]K. K. Gola, M. Dhingra, B. Gupta, and R. Rathore, “An empirical study on underwater acoustic sensor networks based on localization and routing approaches,” Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 175, p. 103319, 2023.
[13]M. U. Khan, P. Otero, and M. Aamir, “An energy efficient clustering routing protocol based on arithmetic progression for underwater acoustic sensor networks,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 6964–6975, 2024.
[14]X. Tian, X. Du, L. Wang, L. Zhao, and D. Han, “LSLPR: A Layering and Source-Location-Privacy based Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 23, no. 19, pp. 23676–23691, 2023.
[15]M. Tarif and B. N. Moghadam, A review of Energy Efficient Routing Protocols in Underwater Internet of Things. arXiv preprint arXiv:. 2023.
[16]S. Azad, A. A. Neffati, M. Mahmud, M. S. Kaiser, M. R. Ahmed, and J. Kamruzzaman, “UDTN-RS: A New Underwater Delay Tolerant Network Routing Protocol for Coastal Patrol and Surveillance,” IEEE Access, vol. 11,142780–142793, 2023.
[17]Y. Shi, X. Xue, B. Wang, K. Hao, and H. Chai, “High-Efficiency Clustering Routing Protocol in AUV-Assisted Underwater Sensor Networks,” Sensors (Basel), vol. 24, no. 20, p. 6661, Oct. 16, 2024.
[18]X. Feng, Y. Zhang, A. Gao, and Q. Hu, “Research on AUV Multi-Node Networking Communication Based on Underwater Electric Field CSMA/CA Channel,” Biomimetics (Basel), vol. 9, no. 11, p. 653, Oct. 25, 2024.
[19]W. Zhu, X. Zeng, and Y. Qiu, “A routing protocol for underwater acoustic-optical hybrid wireless sensor networks based on packet hierarchy and void processing,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 5203–5214, 2024.
[20]R. Zhu, A. Boukerche, L. Feng, and Q. Yang, “A trust management-based secure routing protocol with AUV-aided path repairing for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks,” Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 149, p. 103212, 2023.
[21]K. Sathish, R. C. Venkata, R. Anbazhagan, and G. Pau, Review of localization and clustering in USV and AUV for underwater wireless sensor networks. InTelecom 2023 (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 43-64). MDPI.
[22]Y. Zhang, Q. Wang, Y. Shen, and B. He, “An online path planning algorithm for autonomous marine geomorphological surveys based on AUV,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 118, p. 105548, 2023.
[23]M. Abdel-Basset, R. Mohamed, M. Jameel, and M. Abouhawwash, “Spider wasp optimizer: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 11675–11738, 2023.
[24]L. Zhang, X. Li, A. Arnab, K. Yang, Y. Tong, and P. H. Torr, Dual graph convolutional network for semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:. 2019.
[25]Y. Wang and M. Wang, “Robust scRNA-seq Cell Types Identification by Self-Guided Deep Clustering Network,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 60222–60233, 2024.
[26]Y. F. Yu, G. Zhong, Y. Zhou, and L. F. S.-G. A. N. Chen, “Fuzzy Self-guided structure retention generative adversarial network for medical image enhancement,” Inf. Sci., vol. 642, p. 119114, 2023.
[27]M. Abdel-Basset, R. Mohamed, S. A. Azeem, M. Jameel, and M. Abouhawwash, “Kepler optimization algorithm: A new metaheuristic algorithm inspired by Kepler’s laws of planetary motion,” Knowl. Base. Syst., vol. 268, p. 110454, 2023.