Work place: Dept. of CSE, CMR College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
E-mail: b.rajarao1207@gmail.com
Website: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6218-8166
Research Interests:
Biography
Dr. B. Rajarao holds a PhD in Computer Science and Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India. He holds an M.Tech. Degree in Computer Science and Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, Telangana. He received a B.Tech. degree in Information Technology from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. He is research areas are Cloud Computing, IoT, Machine Learning, Block Chain, Network Security, Data Mining and Deep Learning. He published various papers in international/national journals and also published books, book chapters. He had three copyrights. He can be contacted at b.rajarao1207@gmail.com
By Rajendra Prasad Banavathu James Stephen Meka K. Venkateswara Rao B. Raja Rao Yaswanth Kumar Peddagamalla
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijem.2026.04.19, Pub. Date: 8 Aug. 2026
In the context of medical diagnosis, the identification of human blood groups plays a significant role. To perform the identification of human blood groups, usually invasive identification methods are used. However, due to the limitations of the invasive methods of blood group identification, the use of fingerprint-based identification of human blood groups gained significance recently. In this paper, an accurate comparison of the recently developed deep learning models of fingerprint-based blood group identification techniques is provided. Five CNN-based models, such as ConvNeXt-Tiny, ConvNeXt-Small, EfficientNetV2-S, RepVGG-B3g4, and MobileViT-V2 models for the identification of human blood groups, are implemented. The results obtained in the experiment, considering the accuracy of the models, have proved the EfficientNetV2-S model to have the highest accuracy of 98.84%, followed by the ConvNeXt-Small, ConvNeXt-Tiny, MobileViT-V2, and RepVGG-B3g4 models with accuracies of 97.66%, 97.21%, 97.08%, and 96.98%, respectively.
[...] Read more.Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MECS Press journals