International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies (IJWMT)
IJWMT Vol. 16, No. 5, 8 Oct. 2026
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 1404KB)
Impact of Deployment Geometry and Radio Range on Random Walk–Based SLP Protocols in WSNs
PDF (1404KB), PP.348-364
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Raja Manjula
1,*
Tejodbhav Koduru
1
Kandimalla Sai Yasheswini
1
Tumala Meghana
1
Kamineni Shasank
1
Anirban Ghosh
1
Anuj Deshpande
1
Sibendu Samanta
1
Index Terms
IoT, Performance Effectiveness, Network Shape and Size, Radio Range, Source Location Privacy, WSN
Abstract
This research aims to understand the impact of the network area and shape on the performance metrics used in evaluating the random walk-based source location privacy (SLP) techniques developed for WSNs. In this context, the impact of circular and square network models for different network areas, node densities, and radio ranges of sensor nodes on the performance of three popular SLP techniques is investigated. The effectiveness is assessed using performance measures from the body of available literature. It has been found that square deployment performs better for sector-based SLP protocols when network area, node density, and node radio range are held constant. However, circular networks perform better for the same protocol when the radio range is varied beyond a certain threshold while holding all other parameters constant. The trend, however, changes under comparable network settings for the non-sector-based random walk protocols considered in the current work. The results reveal a strong link between deployment geometry and routing logic, demonstrating that sector-based SLP protocols are primarily geometry-sensitive, whereas non-sector-based protocols are more sensitive to radio-range variations. A radio-range threshold of approximately 100 m was identified beyond which privacy gains saturated and energy costs increased. These findings provide practical design guidelines for geometry-aware deployment of privacy-preserving WSNs. However, the conclusions are limited to simulation-based evaluation of three random walk-based SLP protocols in circular and square network topologies, and further validation in irregular and real-world deployments is required.
Cite This Paper
Raja Manjula, Tejodbhav Koduru, Kandimalla Sai Yasheswini, Tumala Meghana, Kamineni Shasank, Anirban Ghosh, Anuj Deshpande, Sibendu Samanta, "Impact of Deployment Geometry and Radio Range on Random Walk–Based SLP Protocols in WSNs", International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies(IJWMT), Vol.16, No.5, pp. 348-364, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijwmt.2026.05.21
Reference
[1]N. Sharma and R. Bhatt, “Source location privacy preservation in iot-enabled event-driven WSNs,” International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPCC-05-2022-0214
[2]T. Ojha, S. Misra, and N. S. Raghuwanshi, “Wireless sensor networks for agriculture: The state-of-the-art in practice and future challenges,” Computers and electronics in agriculture, vol. 118, pp. 66–84, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.011
[3]M. Raj, N. Li, D. Liu, M. Wright, and S. K. Das, “Using data mules to preserve source location privacy in wireless sensor networks,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 11, pp. 244–260, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.10.002
[4]H. Chen and W. Lou, “On protecting end-to-end location privacy against local eavesdropper in wireless sensor networks,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 16, pp. 36–50, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.01.006
[5]A. Sarumathi and S. Sivanesh, “Leveraging levy flight and lotus effect for secure routing and anomaly detection in wireless sensor network,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 39, no. 2, p. e70348, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.70348
[6]M. Trigka and E. Dritsas, “Wireless sensor networks: From fundamentals and applications to innovations and future trends,” IEEE Access, 2025. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3572328
[7]L. Sun, X. Shen, Y. Yuan, W. Xie, Y. Yan, and H. Wang, “Multi-dimensional dynamic trust routing for multi-attack underwater acoustic sensor networks,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 348, p. 124025, 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.124025
[8]M.-H. Wei, C.-M. Chao, C.-Y. Lin, and C.-C. Yeh, “Fake path co-construction source location privacy protection scheme design for UWSNs,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 20, pp. 9139–9150, 2025. DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2025.3597212
[9]R. Uppal, “Darpa’s n-zero extends the lifetime of iot devices and remote sensors from months to years,” https://idstch.com/technology/ict/darpa-s-n-zero-program-will-allow-unattended-wireless-sensor-networkmonitoring-for-years/, 2008, [Online; accessed 29-June-2022].
[10]S. Corporation, “Semtech lora technology tracks location of endangered black rhinos in Africa,” https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/01/17/906237/0/en/Semtech-LoRa-Technology-TracksLocation-of-Endangered-Black-Rhinos-in-Africa.html, 2008, [Online; accessed 30-June-2022].
[11]R. Rios, J. Cuellar, and J. Lopez, “Probabilistic receiver-location privacy protection in wireless sensor networks,” Information Sciences, vol. 321, pp. 205–223, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.01.016
[12]H. Wang, G. Han, C. Zhu, S. Chan, and W. Zhang, “Tcslp: A trace cost based source location privacy protection scheme in wsns for smart cities,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 107, pp. 965–974, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.07.051
[13]G. Han, R. Xia, H. Wang, C. Lin, Y. Ma, and S. Wang, “Source location privacy protection algorithm for polyhedral phantom routing based on secure zone in autonomous underwater vehicle-aided UASNs,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2025.3538077
[14]X. Tian, X. Du, X. Liu, L. Wang, and L. Zhao, “A low-delay source-location-privacy protection scheme with multi-UV collaboration for underwater acoustic sensor networks,” IEEE Sensors Journal, 2025. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2025.3542783
[15]G. Han, H. Wang, J. A. Ansere, J. Jiang, and Y. Peng, “SSLP: A stratification-based source location privacy scheme in underwater acoustic sensor networks,” IEEE Network, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 188–195, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/MNET.001.1900478
[16]C. Ozturk, Y. Zhang, W. Trappe, and M. Ott, “Source-location privacy for networks of energy-constrained sensors,” in Second IEEE Workshop on Software Technologies for Future Embedded and Ubiquitous Systems, 2004. Proceedings. IEEE, 2004, pp. 68–72. DOI: 10.1109/WSTFES.2004.1300417
[17]“Lonar lake,” https://tinyurl.com/3pr9daaa, 2020, [Online; accessed 3-March-2026].
[18]“Ngorongoro conservation area,” https://tinyurl.com/4fstve39, [Online; accessed 3-March-2026].
[19]“Circular inca terraces in moray (cuzco - peru),” https://tinyurl.com/yeyuxa6x, [Online; accessed 3-March-2026].
[20]T. Shu, M. Krunz, and S. Liu, “Secure data collection in wireless sensor networks using randomized dispersive routes,” IEEE transactions on mobile computing, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 941–954, 2010. DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2010.36
[21]A. Liu, Z. Zheng, C. Zhang, Z. Chen, and X. Shen, “Secure and energy-efficient disjoint multipath routing for wsns,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 3255–3265, 2012. DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2012.2205284
[22]R. Manjula and D. Raja, “An enhanced source location privacy protection technique for wireless sensor networks using randomized routes,” IETE Journal of Research, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 764–776, 2018.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2017.1371652
[23]N. Jan, S. Khan, A. H. Al-Bayatti, M. O. Alassafi, A. S. Alfakeeh, and M. A. Alqarni, “C2s2-loop: Circular chessboard-based secure source location privacy model using ecc-alo in wsn,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2021, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9912626
[24]G. Kumar, R. S. Rathore, K. Thakur, A. Almadhor, S. A. A. Biabani, and S. Chander, “Dynamic routing approach for enhancing source location privacy in wireless sensor networks,” Wireless Networks, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2591–2607, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03322-8
[25]G. Han, M. Xu, Y. He, J. Jiang, J. A. Ansere, and W. Zhang, “A dynamic ring-based routing scheme for source location privacy in wireless sensor networks,” Information Sciences, vol. 504, pp. 308–323, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.028
[26]F. Mukamanzi, R. Manjula, T. Koduru, and R. Datta, “Position-independent and section-based source location privacy protection in WSN” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 6636–6646, 2023. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2022.3183804
[27]R. Manjula, T. Koduru, and R. Datta, “Protecting source location privacy in iot enabled wireless sensor networks: the case of multiple assets,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3126171
[28]Nisha and S. Suresh, “A red-zone-based randomized angular routing protocol for multisource location privacy in IoT applications,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 38, no. 5, p. e6014, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.6014
[29]Nisha and S. Suresh, “A confounding-domain randomized approach for providing source location privacy preservation for wireless sensor networks,” IETE Technical Review, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 635–649, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02564602.2024.2357547
[30]S. Saginbekov and D. Oryspayev, “Snowflakes: Efficient schemes for source location privacy in wireless sensor networks,” Computer Networks, vol. 265, p. 111277, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111277
[31]M. Bradbury, M. Leeke, and A. Jhumka, “A dynamic fake source algorithm for source location privacy in wireless sensor networks,” in 2015 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA, vol. 1, 2015, pp. 531–538. DOI: 10.1109/Trustcom.2015.416
[32]C. Gu, M. Bradbury, J. Kirton, and A. Jhumka, “A decision theoretic framework for selecting source location privacy aware routing protocols in wireless sensor networks,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 87, pp. 514–526, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.01.046
[33]J. Kirton, M. Bradbury, and A. Jhumka, “Towards optimal source location privacy-aware TDMA schedules in wireless sensor networks,” Computer Networks, vol. 146, pp. 125–137, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.09.010
[34]N. Jan, A. H. Al-Bayatti, N. Alalwan, and A. I. Alzahrani, “An enhanced source location privacy based on data dissemination in wireless sensor networks (delp),” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 9, p. 2050, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19092050
[35]G. Han, H. Wang, X. Miao, L. Liu, J. Jiang, and Y. Peng, “A dynamic multipath scheme for protecting source location privacy using multiple sinks in WSNs intended for iiot,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 5527–5538, 2020. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2019.2953937
[36]Y. He, G. Han, H. Wang, J. A. Ansere, and W. Zhang, “A sector-based random routing scheme for protecting the source location privacy in WSNs for the internet of things,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 96, pp. 438– 448, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.02.049
[37]M. Singh and M. P. Singh, “Awareness based gannet optimization for source location privacy preservation with multiple assets in wireless sensor networks,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, vol. 36, no. 21, p. e8191, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.8191
[38]Arpitha T., Dharamendra Chouhan, and Shreyas J., “DQ-NN and phantom routing for enhanced source location privacy for IoT under multiple source and destination,” EURASIP Journal on Information Security, vol. 2024, no. 1, p. 29, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13635-024-00176-1
[39]M. Singh and M. P. Singh, “Congestion avoidance with source location privacy using octopus-based dynamic routing protocol in WSN,” Wireless Networks, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 729–748, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-03165-9
[40]M. Bradbury and A. Jhumka, “Quantifying source location privacy routing performance via divergence and information loss,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 17, pp. 3890–3905, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2022.3217385
[41]T. Koduru and R. Manjula, “Source location privacy in wireless sensor networks: What is the right choice of privacy metric?” Wireless Networks, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1891–1898, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03237-4
[42]W. B. Heinzelman, A. P. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, “An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on wireless communications, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 660–670, 2002. DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2002.804190
[43]J. Deng, R. Han, and S. Mishra, “Decorrelating wireless sensor network traffic to inhibit traffic analysis attacks,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 159–186, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2005.12.003