International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security (IJCNIS)
IJCNIS Vol. 18, No. 5, 8 Oct. 2026
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 520KB)
Author(s)
Index Terms
Post-Quantum Cryptography, File Security, Kyber, AES-GCM, Hybrid Encryption, GovDocs1.
Abstract
The shift towards a quantum-secured future has driven the demand for more practical ways of protecting files that can add post-quantum cryptographic components without creating a massive increase in computational or storage demands. This study proposes and tests a hybrid file-security approach combining a post-quantum key encapsulation mechanism and authenticated symmetric encryption for real-world file security. An experimental research design was followed with the use of a valid subset of GovDocs1 corpus as the evaluation sample, and the files were stratified based on the format, size and entropy characteristics. Three different architectures were designed, built and evaluated for design evolution from direct lattice-style architecture to standards-based hybrid architecture. Correctness, runtime, and ciphertext expansion were used to measure performance and compared to other files of various types and data characteristics. The results demonstrate the capability of the final framework to retain the exact reconstruction of the file and gain significantly in storage efficiency and execution time over previous model generations. A comparison of performance over different heterogeneous categories of files showed no significant difference, and overhead was seen to be a consistent decreasing function of file size. The results show that a hybrid design that can provide quantum resistant key protection and efficient authenticated encryption can be used to provide practical post-quantum-ready file security. The study offers an empirically supported framework for the security of files in a post-quantum era and offers a repeatable foundation for research into implementing it for deployment.
Cite This Paper
Moulay Ibrahim El-Khalil Ghembaza, "Efficient Hybrid Post-Quantum File Security Framework", International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security(IJCNIS), Vol.18, No.5, pp. 108-118, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijcnis.2026.05.07
Reference
[1]G. Alagic et al., “Status report on the fourth round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process,” NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR) 8545, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2025.
[2]M. Mosca and M. Piani, “2021 quantum threat timeline report,” Global Risk Institute, 2022.
[3]V. A. Thakor, M. A. Razzaque, and M. R. Khandaker, “Lightweight cryptography algorithms for resource-constrained IoT devices: A review, comparison and research opportunities,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 28177–28193, 2021.
[4]M. J. Dworkin, “Recommendation for block cipher modes of operation: Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) and GMAC,” NIST Special Publication 800-38D, 2007.
[5]M. Kumar, “Post-quantum cryptography algorithms standardization and performance analysis,” Array, vol. 15, p. 100242, 2022.
[6]M. Almutairi and F. T. Sheldon, “Resilience of post-quantum cryptography in lightweight IoT protocols: A systematic review,” Eng, vol. 6, no. 12, p. 346, 2025.
[7]K. Cherkaoui Dekkaki, I. Tasic, and M. D. Cano, “Exploring post-quantum cryptography: Review and directions for the transition process,” Technologies, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 241, 2024.
[8]A. Shaller, L. Zamir, and M. Nojoumian, “Roadmap of post-quantum cryptography standardization: Side-channel attacks and countermeasures,” Information and Computation, vol. 295, p. 105112, 2023.
[9]M. A. Ehsan et al., “Post-quantum KEMs for IoT: A study of Kyber and NTRU,” Symmetry, vol. 17, no. 6, p. 881, 2025.
[10]W. Beullens, “Breaking rainbow takes a weekend on a laptop,” in Proc. CRYPTO, Springer, 2022, pp. 464–479.
[11]E. Bindal and A. K. Singh, “Secure and compact: A new variant of McEliece cryptosystem,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 35586–35596, 2024.
[12]J. Cai and X. Zhang, “Low-complexity parallel min-sum medium-density parity-check decoder for McEliece cryptosystem,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 5328–5338, 2023.
[13]S. He, H. Li, F. Li, and R. Ma, “A lightweight hardware implementation of CRYSTALS-Kyber,” J. Inf. Intell., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 167–176, 2024.
[14]D. Verchyk and J. Sepúlveda, “A practical study of post-quantum enhanced identity-based encryption,” Microprocessors and Microsystems, vol. 99, p. 104828, 2023.
[15]Z. Huang et al., “A comprehensive side-channel leakage assessment of CRYSTALS-Kyber in IIoT,” Internet of Things, vol. 27, p. 101331, 2024.
[16]M. Iavich and T. Kuchukhidze, “Investigating CRYSTALS-Kyber vulnerabilities: Attack analysis and mitigation,” Cryptography, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 15, 2024.
[17]C. Ghiban and M. O. Choudary, “Improved correlation power analysis attack on the latest Cortex-M4 Kyber implementation,” Cryptography, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 19, 2025.
[18]Y. Yang et al., “Chosen ciphertext correlation power analysis on Kyber,” Integration, vol. 91, pp. 10–22, 2023.
[19]M. Saoudi et al., “Low latency FPGA implementation of NTT for Kyber,” Microprocessors and Microsystems, vol. 107, p. 105059, 2024.
[20]P. Cibik et al., “Quantum-resistant hardware-accelerated IoT traffic encryptor,” Internet of Things, vol. 31, p. 101554, 2025.
[21]K. Zhang et al., “Optimized quantum-resistant cryptosystem: Integrating Kyber-KEM with hardware TRNG on Zynq platform,” Electronics, vol. 14, no. 13, p. 2591, 2025.
[22]S. Garfinkel, P. Farrell, V. Roussev, and G. Dinolt, “Bringing science to digital forensics with standardized forensic corpora,” in Proc. Digital Forensic Research Workshop (DFRWS), 2009. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcorpora.org/corpora/file-corpora/files/