Trust-aware Secure Routing and Intrusion Detection in MANETs Using Dilated Convolutional Multi-Relational Graph Attention Network

PDF (994KB), PP.1-21

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

I. V. Ravi Kumar 1,2,* Prasada Reddy. M. M. 3 B. Nancharaiah 4

1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, GIET University, Gunupur, Odisha, 765022, India

2. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Swarnandhra College of Engineering and Technology, Narsapur 534 280, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India

3. Dept. of ECE, GIET University, Gunupur, Odisha - 765022., India

4. ECE Department, Usha Rama College of Engineering and Technology, Telaprolu- 521 109, A.P., India

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2026.04.01

Received: 19 Dec. 2024 / Revised: 10 Mar. 2025 / Accepted: 23 Aug. 2025 / Published: 8 Aug. 2026

Index Terms

Mobile Ad hoc Networks, Intrusion Detection System, Osprey Optimization Algorithm, Dilated Convolutional Multi-Relational Graph Attention Network, Hybrid Adaptive Genghis Khan Shark Gold Rush Optimization Algorithm

Abstract

Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) are a rapidly developing technology, making their security a major concern. In order to enable trust-aware and attack-resilient routing, the goal of this research is to develop an intrusion detection system (S-IDS) based on deep learning (DL). By leveraging trust values of the nodes using Osprey Optimization Algorithm (OOA), the presented Dilated Convolutional Multi-Relational Graph Attention Network (DConMRG-Net) based Intrusion Detection System (IDS) identifies potential intruders, ensuring that the paths generated within the MANET are reliable and resilient. Additionally, a novel optimization algorithm namely, Hybrid Adaptive Genghis Khan Shark Gold Rush Optimization (HAGKS-GRO) Algorithm is introduced by combining the Adaptive Genghis Khan Shark Optimization (AGKSO) Algorithm with Gold Rush Optimization (GRO) Algorithm for optimal path selection. Two situations are examined: one in which there is no attack and the other in which there is an attack. Relevant performance metrics are evaluated in connection with these scenarios, including throughput, packet delivery ratio, attack identification rate, accuracy, error rate and computation time. Evaluation results demonstrate significant improvements, with a maximum detection rate of 99% with a minimum computational time of 55ms for with attack case and 51ms for without attack case. The proposed model surpasses the state-of-the-art attack detection techniques and achieves high efficiency, according to the simulation results.

Cite This Paper

V. Ravi Kumar, Prasada Reddy. M. M., B. Nancharaiah, "Trust-aware Secure Routing and Intrusion Detection in MANETs Using Dilated Convolutional Multi-Relational Graph Attention Network", International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security(IJCNIS), Vol.18, No.4, pp. 1-21, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijcnis.2026.04.01

Reference

[1]M. Abdan and S. A. Seno, “Machine learning methods for intrusive detection of wormhole attack in mobile ad hoc network (MANET),” Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 2375702, 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2375702
[2]R. Prasad, “Secure intrusion detection system routing protocol for mobile ad‐hoc network,” Glob. Transit. Proc., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 399–411, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.gltp.2021.10.001
[3]S. Shafi, S. Mounika, and S. J. Velliangiri, “Machine learning and trust based AODV routing protocol to mitigate flooding and blackhole attacks in MANET,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 218, pp. 2309–2318, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.206
[4]C. E. Singh and S. M. Vigila, “Fuzzy based intrusion detection system in MANET,” Meas. Sensors, vol. 26, p. 100578, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.measen.2022.100578
[5]M. Prasad, S. Tripathi, and K. Dahal, “An enhanced detection system against routing attacks in mobile ad-hoc network,” Wirel. Netw., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1411–1428, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11276-022-02913-1
[6]R. Meddeb, F. Jemili, B. Triki, and O. Korbaa, “A deep learning-based intrusion detection approach for mobile Ad-hoc network,” Soft Comput., vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 9425–9439, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00500-023-08324-4
[7]U. Srilakshmi, S. A. Alghamdi, V. A. Vuyyuru, N. Veeraiah, and Y. Alotaibi, “A secure optimization routing algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 14260–14269, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3144679
[8]Sharma N, Biswas S. Trust‐Based Hybrid Routing Approach for Securing MANET. Smart and Sustainable Approaches for Optimizing Performance of Wireless Networks: Real‐time Applications. 2022;271-8. DOI: 10.1002/9781119682554.ch15
[9]N. Veeraiah and B. T. Krishna, “An approach for optimal-secure multi-path routing and intrusion detection in MANET,” Evol. Intell., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s12065-020-00388-7
[10]S. A. Alghamdi, “Novel trust-aware intrusion detection and prevention system for 5G MANET–Cloud,” Int. J. Inf. Secur., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 469–488, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s10207-020-00531-6
[11]S. Ravi, S. Matheswaran, U. Perumal, S. Sivakumar, and S. K. Palvadi, “Adaptive trust-based secure and optimal route selection algorithm for MANET using hybrid fuzzy optimization,” Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 22–34, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s12083-022-01351-2
[12]R. Suganthi, I. Poonguzhali, J. Navarajan, R. Krishnaveni, and N. N. Saranya, “Trust based efficient routing (TER) protocol for MANETS,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 80, pp. 2014–2021, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.047
[13]Chiejina, Eric. A robust Dirichlet reputation and trust evaluation of nodes in mobile ad hoc networks. Sensors 2022; 22.2 571. DOI: 10.3390/s22020571
[14]N. A. Alawad, B. H. Abed-alguni, M. A. Al-Betar, and A. Jaradat, “Binary improved white shark algorithm for intrusion detection systems,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 35, no. 26, pp. 19427–19451, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-023-08772-x
[15]I. H. Hassan, A. Mohammed, and M. A. Masama, Metaheuristic algorithms in network intrusion detection. Comprehensive Metaheuristics, 2023, pp. 95–129.
[16]S. N. Bushra, N. Subramanian, and A. Chandrasekar, “An optimal and secure environment for intrusion detection using hybrid optimization based ResNet 101-C model,” Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2307–2324, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s12083-023-01500-1
[17]S. Gavel, A. S. Raghuvanshi, and S. Tiwari, “An optimized maximum correlation based feature reduction scheme for intrusion detection in data networks,” Wirel. Netw., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2609–2624, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11276-022-02988-w
[18]N. Biyyapu, E. J. Veerapaneni, P. P. Surapaneni, S. S. Vellela, and R. Vatambeti, “Designing a modified feature aggregation model with hybrid sampling techniques for network intrusion detection,” Cluster Comput., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1–9, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10586-024-04270-4
[19]M. Bhavsar, Y. Bekele, K. Roy, J. Kelly, and D. F. L.-I. D. S. Limbrick, “Federated Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System Using Edge Devices for Transportation IoT,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 52215–52226, 2024. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3386631
[20]V. R. Balasaraswathi, L. Mary Shamala, Y. Hamid, M. Pachhaiammal Alias Priya, M. Shobana, and M. Sugumaran, “An efficient feature selection for intrusion detection system using B-HKNN and C2 search based learning model,” Neural Process. Lett., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 5143–5167, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11063-022-10854-1
[21]T. Jiang, X. Fu, and M. Wang, “BBO-CFAT: Network intrusion detection model based on BBO algorithm and hierarchical transformer,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 54191–54201, 2024. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3386405
[22]B. Krishnasamy, L. Muthaiah, J. E. Kamali Pushparaj, and P. S. Pandey, “DIWGAN optimized with Namib Beetle Optimization Algorithm for intrusion detection in mobile ad hoc networks,” J. Inst. Electron. Telecommun. Eng., vol. •••, pp. 1–20, 2023.
[23]M. Dehghani and P. Trojovský, “Osprey optimization algorithm: A new bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems,” Front. Mech. Eng., vol. 8, p. 1126450, 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fmech.2022.1126450
[24]G. Lin, Q. Wu, L. Qiu, and X. Huang, “Image super-resolution using a dilated convolutional neural network,” Neurocomputing, vol. 275, pp. 1219–1230, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.062
[25]G. Dai, X. Wang, X. Zou, C. Liu, and S. Cen, “MRGAT: Multi-Relational Graph Attention Network for knowledge graph completion,” Neural Netw., vol. 154, pp. 234–245, Oct. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.07.014
[26]G. Hu, Y. Guo, G. Wei, and L. Abualigah, “Genghis Khan shark optimizer: A novel nature-inspired algorithm for engineering optimization,” Adv. Eng. Inform., vol. 58, p. 102210, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2023.102210
[27]S. Sarjamei, M. S. Massoudi, and M. Esfandi Sarafraz, “Gold rush optimization algorithm,” Iran Univ. Sci. Technol., vol. 11, pp. 291–327, 2021.
[28]K. Nirmaladevi and K. Prabha, “A selfish node trust aware with Optimized Clustering for reliable routing protocol in Manet,” Meas. Sensors, vol. 26, p. 100680, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.measen.2023.100680
[29]G. V. Lakshmi and P. Vaishnavi, “A trusted security approach to detect and isolate routing attacks in mobile ad hoc networks,” J. Eng. Res. (Ponta Grossa), 2023.
[30]M. Rao, P. Chaudhary, K. Sheoran, and G. Dhand, “A secure routing protocol using hybrid deep regression based trust evaluation and clustering for mobile ad-hoc network,” Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2794–2810, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s12083-023-01560-3
[31]S. Shafi, S. Mounika, and S. J. Velliangiri, “Machine learning and trust based AODV routing protocol to mitigate flooding and blackhole attacks in MANET,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 218, pp. 2309–2318, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.206