Performance Optimization of Vehicle-to-vehicle Communication through Reactive Routing Protocol Analysis

PDF (697KB), PP.100-112

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Ketut Bayu Yogha Bintoro 1,* Tri Kuntoro Priyambodo 2 Kunto Wicaksono 1 Ade Syahputra 1,3

1. Departement of Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Sciences, Technology and Design, Trilogi University, Jakarta, Indonesia

2. Departement of Computer Science and Electronics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

3. Departement of Information and communications technology management from the University of South Australia, Australia

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijcnis.2025.04.07

Received: 26 Nov. 2024 / Revised: 9 Jan. 2025 / Accepted: 27 Mar. 2025 / Published: 8 Aug. 2028

Index Terms

AODV, LA-AODV, Parameter Tuning, Quality of Service, V2V Communication

Abstract

The study focuses on improving the Quality of Service (QoS) in Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication within Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) by enhancing the Learning Automata-based Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (LA-AODV) routing protocol. Unlike the standard AODV, which is a reactive routing protocol, and previous configurations of LA-AODV, this research introduces a fine-tuning strategy for the learning automata parameters. This strategy allows the parameters to dynamically adapt to changing network conditions to reduce routing overhead and enhance transmission stability. Three modified versions of LA-AODV referred to as setups A, B, and C, are evaluated against the standard AODV and earlier LA-AODV configurations. The performance of each setup is measured using key QoS metrics: flood ID, packet loss ratio (PLR), packet delivery ratio (PDR), average throughput, end-to-end delay, and jitter. These metrics are crucial in evaluating the efficiency, reliability, and performance of V2V communication systems within VANETs. The results demonstrate that the LA-AODV variants significantly reduce flood ID counts, which represent the number of times a packet is broadcasted, compared to AODV, with setups A and B achieving reductions of 10.24% and 28.74%, respectively, at 200 transmissions, indicating enhanced scalability. Additionally, LA-AODV setup A provides 5.4% higher throughput in high-density scenarios. The modified versions also significantly decrease delay and jitter, achieving reductions of over 99.99% and 99.93%, respectively, at 50 transmissions. These findings underscore the adaptive capabilities of the proposed LA-AODV modifications, providing reassurance about the robustness of the system. They also highlight the importance of parameter optimization in maintaining reliable V2V communication. Future work will benchmark LA-AODV against other state-of-the-art protocols to validate its effectiveness further.

Cite This Paper

Ketut Bayu Yogha Bintoro, Tri Kuntoro Priyambodo, Kunto Wicaksono, Ade Syahputra, "Performance Optimization of Vehicle-to-vehicle Communication through Reactive Routing Protocol Analysis", International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security(IJCNIS), Vol.17, No.4, pp.100-112, 2025. DOI:10.5815/ijcnis.2025.04.07

Reference

[1]E. Mezher, A. A. AbdulRazzaq, and R. K. Hassoun, “A comparison of the performance of the ad hoc on-demand distance vector protocol in the urban and highway environment,” Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1509–1515, 2023, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v30.i3.pp1509-1515.
[2]A. Al-Ahwal and R. A. Mahmoud, “Performance Evaluation and Discrimination of AODV and AOMDV VANET Routing Protocols Based on RRSE Technique,” Wirel Pers Commun, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 321–344, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11277-022-09957-8.
[3]M. H. Homaei, S. S. Band, A. Pescape, and A. Mosavi, “DDSLA-RPL: Dynamic Decision System Based on Learning Automata in the RPL Protocol for Achieving QoS,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 63131–63148, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3075378.
[4]A. A. Abdullhaj Saif and K. Kumar, “Enhance the performance of AODV routing protocol in mobile ad-hoc networks,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 2327, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2327/1/012057.
[5]J. Hu, P. Bhowmick, F. Arvin, A. Lanzon, and B. Lennox, “Cooperative Control of Heterogeneous Connected Vehicle Platoons: An Adaptive Leader-Following Approach,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 977–984, 2020, doi: 10.1109/LRA.2020.2966412.
[6]A. Y. Gadalla, Y. S. Mohammed, A. I. Galal, and M. El-Zorkany, “Design and implementation of a safety algorithm on V2V routing protocol,” International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.2478/IJSSIS-2022-0004.
[7]H. Zhao, Y. Li, W. Hao, S. Peeta, and Y. Wang, “Evaluating the Effects of Switching Period of Communication Topologies and Delays on Electric Connected Vehicles Stream with Car-Following Theory,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 7631–7641, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3006122.
[8]Y. Xu, “Routing Strategies and Protocols for Efficient Data Transmission in the Internet of Vehicles: A Comprehensive Review,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 955–965, 2023, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.01409100.
[9]K. B. Y. Bintoro and T. K. Priyambodo, “Learning Automata-Based AODV to Improve V2V Communication in A Dynamic Traffic Simulation,” International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 666–678, 2024, doi: 10.22266/ijies2024.0229.56.
[10]B. S. Kusuma, D. Risqiwati, and D. R. Akbi, “Analisis Perbandingan Performansi Protokol Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector dan Zone Routing Protocol Pada Mobile Ad Hoc Network,” Kinetik: Game Technology, Information System, Computer Network, Computing, Electronics, and Control, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 165–174, 2017, doi: 10.22219/kinetik.v2i3.91.
[11]T. K. Priyambodo, D. Wijayanto, and M. S. Gitakarma, “Performance optimization of MANET networks through routing protocol analysis,” Computers, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.3390/computers10010002.
[12]J. Connors, S. Graham, and L. Mailloux, “Cyber synthetic modeling for vehicle-to-vehicle applications,” Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, ICCWS 2018, vol. 2018-March, no. Im, pp. 594–601, 2018.
[13]H. Ouamna, Z. Madini, and Y. Zouine, “Review article: Optimization of a V2V communication in cognitive radio context,” 2021 International Conference on Optimization and Applications, ICOA 2021, pp. 2–7, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICOA51614.2021.9442643.
[14]L. Hota, B. P. Nayak, A. Kumar, B. Sahoo, and G. G. M. N. Ali, “A Performance Analysis of VANETs Propagation Models and Routing Protocols,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031379.
[15]K. Bintoro, T. Priyambodo, and M. Mustofa, “Optimizing AODV Routing Protocol to Improve Quality of Service Performance for V2V Communication,” 2024 International Conference on Smart Computing, IoT and Machine Learning (SIML), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 180–185, 2024, doi: 10.1109/SIML61815.2024.10578106.
[16]K. Katagiri and T. Fujii, “Demo: Highly Accurate Prediction of Radio Environment for V2V Communications,” 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, DySPAN 2019, pp. 2019–2020, 2019, doi: 10.1109/DySPAN.2019.8935699.
[17]R. Arief, R. Anggoro, and F. X. Arunanto, “Implementation of Aodv Routing Protocol With Vehicle Movement Prediction in Vanet,” Surabaya: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November, 2016.
[18]S. Khadim, F. Riaz, S. Jabbar, S. Khalid, and M. Aloqaily, “A non-cooperative rear-end collision avoidance scheme for non-connected and heterogeneous environment,” Computer Communications, vol. 150, no. April 2019, pp. 828–840, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.11.002.
[19]K. Ashok et al., “Review on Energy Efficient V2V Communication Techniques for a Dynamic and Congested Traffic Environment,” 2022 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics, ICCCI 2022, pp. 0–5, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ICCCI54379.2022.9740853.
[20]B. A. Kumar, M. V. Subramanyam, and K. S. Prasad, “An energy efficient clustering using k-means and AODV routing protocol in Ad-hoc networks,” International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2019, doi: 10.22266/IJIES2019.0430.13.
[21]S. Abba and J. A. Lee, “Bio-inspired self-aware fault-tolerant routing protocol for network-on-chip architectures using Particle Swarm Optimization,” Microprocessors and Microsystems, vol. 51, pp. 1339–1351, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2017.04.003.
[22]E. Daknou, N. Tabbane, and M. Thaalbi, “A MAC multi-channel scheme based on learning-automata for clustered VANETs,” Proceedings - International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, AINA, vol. 2018-May, pp. 71–78, 2018, doi: 10.1109/AINA.2018.00023.
[23]R. S. Bali and N. Kumar, “Learning Automata-assisted Predictive Clustering approach for Vehicular Cyber-Physical System,” Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol. 52, pp. 82–97, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2015.09.007.
[24]A. M. Bamhdi, “Efficient dynamic-power AODV routing protocol based on node density,” Computer Standards and Interfaces, vol. 70, no. November 2019, p. 103406, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2019.103406.
[25]M. R. Hasan, Y. Zhao, Y. Luo, G. Wang, and R. M. Winter, “An Effective AODV-based Flooding Detection and Prevention for Smart Meter Network,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 129, pp. 454–460, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.03.024.