ML-Assisted Joint Optimization of Microwave Components and Wireless Architectures via Adaptive Pelican Optimization

PDF (1052KB), PP.330-347

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Ayshwarya B. 1 R. Naveenkumar 2,* S. Prabu 3 E. Sabitha 4 Arun M. 5 B. Girirajan 6

1. Department of Computer Science, School of Computational and Physical Sciences, Kristu Jayanti (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru - 560077, Karnataka, India

2. CGC University Mohali, Dept of CSE, Punjab, 140307, India

3. Department of ECE, Mahendra Institute of Technology, Namakkal - 636106, India

4. Department of Computer Science and Business Systems, Vel Tech Multi Tech Dr. Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College Avadi, Chennai – 600062, India

5. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Panimalar Engineering College, Poonamallee, Chennai – 600123, Tamil Nadu, India

6. School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, SR University, Warangal – 506371, Telangana, India

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijwmt.2026.05.20

Received: 24 Jul. 2026 / Revised: 15 Aug. 2026 / Accepted: 24 Sep. 2026 / Published: 8 Oct. 2026

Index Terms

Machine Learning, Pelican Optimization Algorithm, Microwave Components, Wireless Architectures, Artificial Intelligence, RF Systems, Beyond-6G Communication, Microwave Antenna Optimization, Beamforming, Intelligent Wireless Networks

Abstract

The rapid evolution of next-generation wireless communication systems has increased the demand for intelligent microwave components and energy-efficient wireless architectures capable of supporting ultra-high data rates, low latency, massive device connectivity, and adaptive resource management. Conventional optimization approaches often experience slow convergence, high computational complexity, and limited adaptability when optimizing multiple communication parameters simultaneously. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a Machine Learning-Assisted Adaptive Pelican Optimization (ML-APO) framework for the joint optimization of microwave components and wireless communication architectures. The proposed framework integrates an Adaptive Pelican Optimization Algorithm with a machine learning-assisted surrogate prediction model that rapidly estimates communication performance metrics, thereby significantly reducing computational overhead during the optimization process. The optimization simultaneously considers transmission power, antenna parameters, microwave component characteristics, spectrum allocation, routing efficiency, and communication reliability through a multi-objective fitness function. The adaptive search strategy of the Pelican Optimization Algorithm effectively balances global exploration and local exploitation, enabling faster convergence toward optimal network configurations while avoiding premature convergence. Extensive simulation results demonstrate that the proposed ML-APO framework achieves 96.41% energy efficiency, 43.8% improvement in network lifetime, 13.56 Gbps throughput, 99.43% packet delivery ratio, 0.49 ms end-to-end latency, and 0.54% packet loss, while reducing optimization time by 35.8% and improving convergence speed by 39.6% compared with existing optimization methods. These results demonstrate that the proposed framework provides an efficient, scalable, and intelligent solution for designing high-performance microwave components and next-generation wireless communication architectures suitable for future 6G and beyond wireless networks.

Cite This Paper

Ayshwarya B., R. Naveenkumar, S. Prabu, E. Sabitha, Arun M., B. Girirajan, "ML-Assisted Joint Optimization of Microwave Components and Wireless Architectures via Adaptive Pelican Optimization", International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies(IJWMT), Vol.16, No.5, pp. 330-347, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijwmt.2026.05.20

Reference

[1]J. L. Volakis, Antenna Engineering Handbook. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2007.
[2]J. L. Volakis, A. Chatterjee, and L. C. Kempel, Finite Element Method for Electromagnetics: Antennas, Microwave Circuits, and Scattering Applications. New York, NY, USA: IEEE Press, 1998.
[3]L. C. Godara, Handbook of Antennas in Wireless Communications (Electrical Engineering & Applied Signal Processing Series), 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2002.
[4] W. C. Gibson, The Method of Moments in Electromagnetics. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2021.
[5]D. Weston, Electromagnetic Compatibility: Principles and Applications. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2023.
[6]H. M. El Misilmani, T. Naous, and S. K. Al Khatib, ‘‘A review on the design and optimization of antennas using machine learning algorithms and techniques,’’ Int. J. RF Microw. Comput.-Aided Eng., vol. 30, no. 10, Oct. 2020, Art. no. e22356, doi: 10.1002/mmce.22356.
[7]M. A. Haque, N. Sarker, N. S. S. Singh, M. A. Rahman, M. N. Hasan, M. Islam, M. A. Zakariya, L. C. Paul, A. H. Sharker, G. E. M. Abro, M. Hannan, and R. Pk, ‘‘Dual band antenna design and prediction of resonance frequency using machine learning approaches,’’ Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 20, p. 10505, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app122010505.
[8]H. M. E. Misilmani and T. Naous, ‘‘Machine learning in antenna design: An overview on machine learning concept and algorithms,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. High Perform. Comput. Simulation (HPCS), Jul. 2019, pp. 600–607, doi: 10.1109/HPCS48598.2019.9188224.
[9]M. M. Khan, S. Hossain, P. Mozumdar, S. Akter, and R. H. Ashique, ‘‘A review on machine learning and deep learning for various antenna design applications,’’ Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 4, Apr. 2022, Art. no. e09317, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09317.
[10]Q. Wu, Y. Cao, H. Wang, and W. Hong, ‘‘Machine-learning-assisted optimization and its application to antenna designs: Opportunities and challenges,’’ China Commun., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 152–164, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.23919/JCC.2020.04.014.
[11]N. S. Kumar and U. D. Yalavarthi, ‘‘A comprehensive review on machine learning based optimization algorithms for antenna design,’’ J. Phys., Conf. Ser., vol. 1964, no. 6, Jul. 2021, Art. no. 062098, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1964/6/062098.
[12]F. Andriulli, P.-Y. Chen, D. Erricolo, and J.-M. Jin, ‘‘Guest editorial machine learning in antenna design, modeling, and measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 4948–4952, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2022.3189963.
[13]M. Sadiq, N. bin Sulaiman, M. M. Isa, and M. Nizar Hamidon, ‘‘A review on machine learning in smart antenna: Methods and techniques,’’ TEM J., vol. 11, pp. 695–705, May 2022, doi: 10.18421/TEM112-24.
[14]G. Yassine, A. H. Aicha, M. Fatiha, and D. Younes, ‘‘Review of machine learning for antenna selection and CSI feedback in multi-antenna systems,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Paradigms Comput., Commun. Data Sci. (PCCDS), 2023, pp. 165–181, doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-8742-7_14.
[15]C. Wu and C.-F. Lai, ‘‘A survey on improving the wireless communication with adaptive antenna selection by intelligent method,’’ Comput. Commun., vol. 181, pp. 374–403, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2021.10.034.
[16]S. Zhong, H. Feng, P. Zhang, J. Xu, H. Luo, J. Zhang, T. Yuan, and L. Huang, ‘‘Deep learning based antenna selection for MIMO SDR system,’’ Sensors, vol. 20, no. 23, p. 6987, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20236987.
[17]Q. Wu, H. Wang, and W. Hong, ‘‘Multistage collaborative machine learning and its application to antenna modeling and optimization,’’ IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 3397–3409, May 2020, doi: 10.1109/TAP.2019.2963570.
[18]M. O. Akinsolu, K. K. Mistry, B. Liu, P. I. Lazaridis, and P. Excell, “Machine learning-assisted antenna design optimization: A review and the state-of-the-art,” Proc. 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: 10.23919/EuCAP48036.2020.9135936.
[19]O. Singh, M. R. Bharamagoudra, H. Gupta, A. K. Dwivedi, P. Ranjan, and A. Sharma, ‘‘Microstrip line fed dielectric resonator antenna optimization using machine learning algorithms,’’ Sadhan ¯ a¯, vol. 47, no. 4, p. 226, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12046-022-01989-x.
[20]T. Banerjee, D. P. Singh, and P. Kour, “Advances in deep neural, transformer learning, and kernel-based methods for diabetic retinopathy detection: A comprehensive review,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 2659–2707, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s11831-025-10376-8.