International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies (IJWMT)
IJWMT Vol. 16, No. 3, 8 Jun. 2026
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 404KB)
Review on Intelligent Security Models for Digital Twins
PDF (404KB), PP.290-304
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Index Terms
Digital Twin Security, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Cyber Threat Detection, Privacy Preservation
Abstract
Digital twins are revolutionizing various industries by enabling real-time monitoring, simulation, and optimization of physical entities through their virtual counterparts. However, the increased interconnectivity between the physical and digital realms introduces significant security and privacy challenges, necessitating the development of intelligent security models. This paper explores the architecture of digital twins and identifies the key characteristics of effective security solutions, such as adaptability, real-time response, data integrity, and privacy preservation. Through a comprehensive literature review, we highlight existing intelligent security frameworks that leverage machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies to address the growing range of cyber threats in digital twin environ-ments. Key observations indicate a trend toward integrating advanced analytics for threat detection and response, as well as the application of block chain technology to enhance data integrity and trust. Furthermore, this paper outlines future research directions, emphasizing the potential of innovations like federated learning, graph neural networks, and transfer learning to bolster security in digital twin systems. By examining these aspects, this work underscores the critical impor-tance of developing robust security frameworks to protect digital twins and ensure their safe deployment across various applications.
Cite This Paper
Raghavendra Babu T M, Harish Kumar K S, "Review on Intelligent Security Models for Digital Twins", International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies(IJWMT), Vol.16, No.3, pp. 290-304, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijwmt.2026.03.19
Reference
[1]Klaus Droder et al. Machine learning with robot control. Procedia CIRP, 76:187–192, 2018.
[2]A. Khan, M. J. Dahl, P. Falkman, and M. Fabian. Digital twin for legacy systems: Simulation model testing and validation. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2018.
[3]S. Singh, M. Weeber, and K. P. Birke. Advancing digital twin implementation: a toolbox for modelling and simula-tion. Procedia CIRP, 99:567–572, Jan 2021.
[4]A. Ait-Alla, M. Kreutz, D. Rippel, M. Lutjen, and M. Freitag. Simulation-based analysis of the interaction of a physical and a digital twin in a cyber-physical production system. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 52(13):1331–1336, Jan 2019.
[5]E. Negri, L. Fumagalli, C. Cimino, and M. Macchi. Fmu-supported simulation for cps digital twin. Procedia Manufacturing, 28:201–206, Jan 2019.
[6]S. Kruger and M. Borsato. Developing knowledge on digital manufacturing to digital twin: a bibliometric and systemic analysis. Procedia Manufacturing, 38:1174–1180, Jan 2019.
[7]H. Latif and B. Starly. A simulation algorithm of a digital twin for manual assembly process. Procedia Manufacturing, 48:932–939, Jan 2020.
[8]K. Semenkov, V. Promyslov, and A. Poletykin. Verification of large scale control systems with hybrid digital models and digital twins. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2020.
[9]M. Atalay and P. Angin. A digital twins approach to smart grid security testing and standardization. In 2020 3rd International Conference on Measurement, Instrumentation and Electronics (ICMIE), 2020.
[10]M. K. Traore. Unifying digital twin framework: Simulation-based proof-of-concept. IFAC-Papers on Line, 54(1):886–893, Jan 2021.
[11]M. F. Falah, S. Sukaridhoto, M. U. H. A. Rasyid, and H. Wicaksono. Design of virtual engineering and digital twin platform as implementation of cyber-physical systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 52:331–336, Jan 2020.
[12]B. A. Talkhestani, D. Braun, W. Schloegl, and M. Weyrich. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of reconfiguring an automation system using digital twin. Procedia CIRP, 93:268–273, Jan 2020.
[13]Cristina Alcaraz and Javier Lopez. Digital twin: A comprehensive survey of security threats. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 24(3):1475–1503, 2022.
[14]Peter Bauer, Bjorn Stevens, and Wilco Hazeleger. A digital twin of earth for the green transition. Nature Climate Change, 11(2):80–83, 2021.
[15]Hailin Feng, Dongliang Chen, and Haibin Lv. Sensible and secure iot communication for digital twins, cyber twins, web twins. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 1:34–44, 2021.
[16]Aidan Fuller, Zhong Fan, Charles Day, and Chris Barlow. Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access, 8:108952–108971, 2020.
[17]Mina Jafari, Abdollah Kavousi-Fard, Tao Chen, and Mazaher Karimi. A review on digital twin technology in smart grid, transportation system and smart city: Challenges and future. IEEE Access, 11:17471–17484, 2023.
[18]Maninder Jeet Kaur, Ved P Mishra, and Piyush Maheshwari. The convergence of digital twin, iot, and machine learning: transforming data into action. In Digital twin technologies and smart cities, pages 3–17. Springer, 2020.
[19]Kostiantyn Maksymenko, Alexander Kenneth Clarke, Irene Mendez Guerra, Samuel Deslauriers-Gauthier, and Dario Farina. A myoelectric digital twin for fast and realistic modelling in deep learning. Nature Communica-tions, 14(1):1600, 2023.
[20]Hanqing Qiu, Huaiqing Zhang, Kexin Lei, Huacong Zhang, and Xingtao Hu. Forest digital twin: A new tool for forest management practices based on spatio-temporal data, 3d simulation engine, and intelligent interactive environment. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 215:108416, 2023.
[21]Csaba Ruzsa. Digital twin technology—external data resources in creating the model and classification of different digital twin types in manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 54:209–215, 2021.
[22]Michael Jacoby and Thomas Uslander. Digital twin and internet of things—current standards landscape. Applied Sciences, 10(18):6519, 2020.
[23]A. A. Neto, E. R. Da Silva, F. Deschamps, and E. P. De Lima. Digital twins in manufacturing: An assessment of key features. Procedia CIRP, 97:178–183, Jan 2021.
[24]A. Chakraborti, A. Heininen, K. Koskinen, and V. S. Lamsa. Digital twin: Multi-dimensional model reduction method for performance optimization of the virtual entity. Procedia CIRP, 93:240–245, Jan 2020.
[25]C. Cimino, G. Ferretti, and A. Leva. The role of dynamics in digital twins and its problem-tailored representation.
[26]IFAC-Papers online, 53(2):10556–10561, Jan 2020.
[27]L. Overbeck et al. Continuous adaptation through real data analysis to turn simulation models into digital twins.
[28]Procedia CIRP, 104:98–103, Jan 2021.
[29]L. Morabito et al. A discrete event simulation based approach for digital twin implementation. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 54(1):414–419, Jan 2021.
[30]V. Kutscher, T. F. Martins, J. Olbort, and R. Anderl. Concept for interaction of hardware simulation and embedded software in a digital twin based test environment. Procedia CIRP, Jan 2021.
[31]L. Wang. Application and development prospect of digital twin technology in aerospace. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 53(5):732–737, Jan 2020.
[32]A. D. Rocha and J. Barata. Digital twin-based optimiser for self-organised collaborative cyber-physical production systems. Manufacturing Letters, 29:79–83, Aug 2021.
[33]B. Maschler, D. Braun, N. Jazdi, and M. Weyrich. Transfer learning as an enabler of the intelligent digital twin.
[34]Procedia CIRP, 100:127–132, Jan 2021.
[35]Z. Mueller-Zhang, P. O. Antonino, and T. Kuhn. Integrated planning and scheduling for customized production using digital twins and reinforcement learning. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 54(1):408–413, Jan 2021.
[36]B. Rohm and R. Anderl. Simulation data management in the digital twin (sdm-dt) – evolution of simulation data management along the product life cycle. Procedia CIRP, 105:847–850, Jan 2022.
[37]T. Y. Melesse, M. Bollo, V. Di Pasquale, F. Centro, and S. Riemma. Machine learning-based digital twin for monitoring fruit quality evolution. Procedia Computer Science, 200:13–20, Jan 2022.
[38]M. M. Muller, N. Jazdi, and M. Weyrich. Self-improving models for the intelligent digital twin: Towards closing the reality-to-simulation gap. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 55(2):126–131, Jan 2022.
[39]F. Xiang, P. Zhou, Y. Zuo, F. Tao, and D. Zhang. Manufacturing service network of digital twin systems under cloud computing environment. Procedia CIRP, 109:460–465, Jan 2022.
[40]G. Tissot, G. Alpan, F. Mangione, and F. Noel. A hybrid simulation/optimization architecture for developing a digital twin. In IFAC-Papers OnLine, volume 55, pages 532–537, 2022.
[41]S. Weckx et al. A cloud-based digital twin for monitoring of an adaptive clamping mechanism used for high performance composite machining. Procedia Computer Science, 200:227–236, Jan 2022.
[42]A. Chiurco, M. Elbasheer, F. Longo, L. Nicoletti, and V. Solina. Data modeling and ml practice for enabling intelligent digital twins in adaptive production planning and control. Procedia Computer Science, 217:1908–1917, Jan 2023.
[43]E. Badakhshan, P. Ball, and A. Badakhshan. Using digital twins for inventory and cash management in supply chains. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 55(10):1980–1985, Jan 2022.
[44]Z. Zhang, G. Yeming, and G. Zailin. Clearing function-based simulation optimization for release planning under digital twin wafer fabs. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 55(10):2539–2544, Jan 2022.
[45]L. Zhang, Y. Yan, Y. Hu, and W. Ren. Reinforcement learning and digital twin-based real-time scheduling method in intelligent manufacturing systems. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 55(10):359–364, Jan 2022.
[46]C. Vasanthan and D. Nguyen. Combining supervised learning and digital twin for autonomous path-planning. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 54(16):7–15, Jan 2021.
[47]S. Chabanet, B. El-Haouzi, and P. Thomas. Toward a self-adaptive digital twin based active learning method: an application to the lumber industry. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 55(2):378–383, Jan 2022.
[48]N. Kolibarov, D. Wastberg, V. Naserentin, D. Petrova-Antonova, S. Ilieva, and A. Logg. Roof segmentation towards digital twin generation in lod2+ using deep learning. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 55(11):173–178, Jan 2022.
[49]Omer San. The digital twin revolution. Nature Computational Science, 1(5):307–308, 2021.
[50]Concetta Semeraro, Mario Lezoche, Herve Panetto, and Michele Dassisti. Digital twin paradigm: A systematic literature review. Computers in Industry, 130:103469, 2021.
[51]Angira Sharma, Edward Kosasih, Jie Zhang, Alexandra Brintrup, and Anisoara Calinescu. Digital twins: State of the art theory and practice, challenges, and open research questions. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 30:100383, 2022.
[52]Maulshree Singh, Evert Fuenmayor, Eoin P Hinchy, Yuansong Qiao, Niall Murray, and Declan Devine. Digital twin: Origin to future. Applied System Innovation, 4(2):36, 2021.
[53]Sabah Suhail, Mubashar Iqbal, Rasheed Hussain, and Raja Jurdak. Enigma: An explainable digital twin security solution for cyber–physical systems. Computers in Industry, 151:103961, 2023.
[54]Xuemin Sun, Jinsong Bao, Jie Li, Yiming Zhang, Shimin Liu, and Bin Zhou. A digital twin-driven approach for the assembly-commissioning of high precision products. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 61:101839, 2020.
[55]Thomas H-J Uhlemann, Christoph Schock, Christian Lehmann, Stefan Freiberger, and Rolf Steinhilper. The digital twin: Demonstrating the potential of real-time data acquisition in production systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 9:113–120, 2017.
[56]Xiaochen Zheng, Jinzhi Lu, and Dimitris Kiritsis. The emergence of cognitive digital twin: Vision, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Production Research, 60(24):7610–7632, 2022.
[57]Cunbo Zhuang, Jingcheng Gong, and Jianhua Liu. Digital twin-based assembly data management and process traceability for complex products. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58:118–131, 2021.
[58]Z. Tian, L. Cui, J. Liang, and S. Yu. A comprehensive survey on poisoning attacks and countermeasures in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(8):1–35, 2023.
[59]J. Ploennigs, K. Semertzidis, F. Lorenzi, and N. Mihindukulasooriya. Scaling knowledge graphs for automating ai of digital twins. In Springer eBooks, pages 810–826. 2022.
[60]Z. Lv and S. Xie. Artificial intelligence in the digital twins: State of the art, challenges, and future research topics.
[61]Digital Twin, 1:12, Nov 2022.
[62]M. Segovia and J. Garcia-Alfaro. Design, modeling and implementation of digital twins. Sensors, 22(14):5396, Jul 2022.
[63]Dong Zhong, Zhelei Xia, Yian Zhu, and Junhua Duan. Overview of predictive maintenance based on digital twin technology. Heliyon, 2023.
[64]L. Gopal, H. Singh, P. Mounica, N. Mohankumar, N. P. Challa, and P. Jayaraman. Digital twin and iot technology for secure manufacturing systems. Measurement: Sensors, 25:100661, Feb 2023.
[65]Suhail S., Jurdak R., and Hussain R. Security attacks and solutions for digital twins. arXiv preprint, 2202.12501, 2022.
[66]C. Steinmetz et al. Digital twins modeling and simulation with node-red and carla. IFAC-Papers OnLine,55(19):97–102, Jan 2022.