IJMECS Vol. 18, No. 2, 8 Apr. 2026
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 1096KB)
PDF (1096KB), PP.100-120
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Escher, GeoGebra, Hands-On Learning, Holonomy, Hyperbolic geometry, Lobachevsky geometry, Mathematics Education, Non-Euclidean geometry, Student Engagement, WebSketchpad
This article primarily aims to introduce high school students to the mystery of Lobachevsky geometry, one of the cornerstones of non-Euclidean geometries. Lobachevsky geometry, often known as hyperbolic geometry, differs from Euclidean geometry in several basic ways. The concepts and figures of Lobachevsky geometry can appear in different plane models, such as the Klein and Poincaré disk models. It further examines students' general attitudes and behaviors toward non-Euclidean geometries. Lobachevsky's geometry has helped expand students' horizons and enriched their critical thinking skills by challenging traditional Euclidean paradigms. This study is supported by a mixed-method approach utilizing quantitative and qualitative data. The mock exam results obtained from students during the educational process were compared, and the study was further supported by the positive feedback received from the participating students. The intriguing lessons on Lobachevsky geometry were conducted over 4 weeks, with weekly 2-hour geometry classes involving 12th-grade students at Stirling Schools in Erbil. Throughout the study, we observed significant improvements in students' ability to adopt, understand, and apply advanced geometric concepts. This article also discusses findings and implications that address gaps in the literature and considers the potential for curriculum updates to enhance the future of geometry education.
Abdullah Kurudirek, "Introducing High School Students to the Mystery of Lobachevsky Geometry", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.18, No.2, pp. 100-120, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2026.02.06
[1]Anisimova, T.I. Forming bachelors’ labor actions in teacher training when studying disciplines of mathematical and natural science cycle. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. Vol.10, Issue 3, pp.157-165, 2015. DOI: 10.12973/mathedu.2015.111a.
[2]Kurudirek, A., & Berdieva, O. The more empowered schools, the more fruitful students. Educenter: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3(1), 1–9, 2024. https://doi.org/10.55904/educenter.v3i1.921
[3]Abdullah, K. Designing a Learning Environment with Some Sophisms: Recommendations for Teachers to Pique Students' Interest and Improve Their Engagement in Maths Sessions. Journal of Advancements in Education, 2(1), 15–28, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13923835
[4]Thurston, W.P. Mathematical Education. arXiv preprint math/0503081, 2005. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0503081
[5]Houzel, C. The birth of non-Euclidean geometry. In: Boi, L., Flament, D., Salanskis, JM. (eds) 1830–1930: A Century of Geometry. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 402. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55408-4_49
[6]Fitzpatrick, R. Euclid’s Elements of Geometry. Edited and provided with a modern English translation, 2008. http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/euclid.html
[7]Efimov, N.V. Higher Geometry. Moscow: Mir Publishers, 1980.
[8]Aydüz, S. Nair Al-Din Al-Tusi's Influence on Ottoman Scientific Literature (Mathematics, Astronomy and Natural Sciences). International Journal of Turkish Studies, 17(1/2), 21, 2011.
[9]Nasr, S.H. "Al-Tusi," Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol.13, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1981.
[10]Houzel, C. “Bolyai, Farkas (Wolfgang),” Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol.2, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1981.
[11]Demirtaş, İ. Salih Zeki introduces Lobachevsky’s geometry: Two conferences in 1915. Studies in Ottoman Science, 7(1): 67-78, 2005.
[12]Struik, D.J. “Beltrami,”Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol.1, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1981.
[13]Shapovalova, N., Panchenko, L., & Bashchuk, O. Hyperbolic Geometry in the Course of Professional Training of Future Mathematics and Physics Teachers. Modern Science — Moderní věda, № 2 , 73-81, 2020.
[14]Widada, W. et al. The cognitive process of students in understanding the triangles in Geometry of Riemann through local content. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1657, IOP Publishing, 2020a. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012033
[15]Rizos, I., & Gkrekas, N. A different perspective on teaching Geometry at high school: The Greek case study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.12304, 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.12304
[16]Delan, S., Bnar, K., Yusupova, R., Kobeeva, E., & Razbekova, A. Teaching Euclidean Geometry and Introducing some non-Euclidean Geometries: Enhancing High School Student Engagement: International Scientific and Practical Conference, 1(1), 422-426, 2024. https://bestjournalup.com/index.php/ispc/article/view/711
[17]Abdullah, K., Zarekeeva, M., Yuldasheva, F., & Mirzabaeva, U. Developing Positive Attitudes Towards non-Euclidean Geometry. International Scientific and Practical Conference, 1(1), 419-422, 2024. https://bestjournalup.com/index.php/ispc/article/view/710
[18]Rodionov, M., & Dedovets, Z. The Development of Students’ Intellectual Tolerance in the Process of Teaching Mathematics at Secondary Level. London Journal of Research in Humanities and Social, 18(2), 1-11, 2018.
[19]Rodin, A. “Did Lobachevsky Have a Model of His ‘Imaginary Geometry’?” Философия науки, (3), 34-63, 2015. DOI: 10.15372/PS20150304
[20]Prasolov, V.V., & Skopenkov, A.B. Some reflections on why Lobachevsky geometry was recognized. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.4902, 2013. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1307.4902
[21]Jenkovszky, L., Lake, M.J., & Soloviev, V. János Bolyai, Carl Friedrich Gauss, Nikolai Lobachevsky and the New Geometry: Foreword. Symmetry 2023, 15, 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/ sym15030707
[22]Widada, W. et al. Students of the extended abstract in proving Lobachevsky’s parallel lines theorem. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1470(1), p. 012098, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012098
[23]Yerzhanat, D., & Nurpeyis, J. Lobachewsky Geometry and Its Elements. Proceedings of the 6th International Scientific Conference «European Research Materials» (May 30-31, 2024). Amsterdam, Netherlands, 337-352.
[24]Asmuth, J.A., & Rips, L.J. Conceptual Change in Non-Euclidean Mathematics. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 28, 2006. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7tn2n8dd
[25]Moyer, T. O. Exploring Hyperbolic Geometry. Ohio Journal of School Mathematics, 98, 41-49, 2024.
[26]Skrodzki, M., Jochems, S., Rijsdijk, J., Snellenberg, R., & Bidarra, R. Holonomy: A Virtual Reality Exploration of Hyperbolic Geometry. In Proceedings of the 29th International ACM Conference on 3D Web Technology (Web3D '24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 10, 1–10, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1145/3665318.3677149
[27]Arslan, M., & Nacaroğlu, O. Examination of Awareness of Gifted Students on Euclidean’s 5th Postulate and The Non-Euclidean Geometries. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 7(1), 14-25, 2020.
[28]Eli, J.A., Mohr-Schroeder, M.J., & Lee, C.W. Mathematical Connections and Their Relationship to Mathematics Knowledge for Teaching Geometry. School Science and Mathematics, 113(3), 120–134. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12009
[29]Li, X., Bergin, C., & Olsen, A.A. Positive teacher-student relationships may lead to better teaching, Learning and Instruction, 80, 101581, 2022.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101581
[30]Gloria, C.C. Mathematical Competence and Performance in Geometry of High School Students. International Journal of Science and Technology. 5(2), 53-69, 2015.
[31]Dan, N. N., Trung, L.T.B.T., Nga, N.T., & Dung, T.M. Digital game-based learning in mathematics education at primary school level: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2423, 2024. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14377
[32]Toktarova, V. “Model of Adaptive System for Mathematical Training of Students within eLearning Environment”, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(20), 99–117, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i20.32923
[33]Gulati, S. Technology-Enhanced Learning in Developing Nations: A review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(1), 1-16, 2008. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i1.477
[34]Serin, H., & Oz, Y. Technology-integrated Mathematics Education at the Secondary School Level. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 3(4), 148-155, 2017. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v3i4p148
[35]Bayne, S. What’s the matter with ‘technology-enhanced learning’? Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 5–20, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.915851
[36]Saralar-Aras, I. & Tütüncü, S. Utilization of Technology for Assessment Purposes Among Mathematics Teachers, in Morska, Janina & Rogerson, Alan (Eds) New Ways of Teaching and Learning, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium of The Mathematics Education for the Future Project, Bologna, Münster: WTM. 291-296, 2024. https://doi.org/10.37626/GA9783959872881.0.51
[37]Saralar-Aras, İ., & Kurudirek, A. Assessing and Advancing Non-Euclidean Geometries in Middle School Mathematics Education: A Case for Curriculum Inclusion. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 17(1), 56-81, 2025. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15064118
[38]Kurudirek, A. Illuminating high school students with some interesting non-Euclidean geometries in the plane. Int J Stat Appl Math, 8(4), 63-68, 2023. https://doi.org/10.22271/maths.2023.v8.i4a.1100
[39]Cardinali, A., Benvenuti,S. Progress Report of an Ongoing Project on Teaching Non-Euclidean Geometries at High School, EDULEARN20 Proceedings, 7555-7564, 2020. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2020.1917
[40]Nugroho, K.U.Z., Sukestiyarno, Y.L., & Nurcahyo, A. The Weaknesses of Euclidean Geometry: A Step of Needs Analysis of Non-Euclidean Geometry Learning through an Ethnomathematics Approach. Edumatika: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 126–149, 2021. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v4i2.1015
[41]Noviyanti, M., Sudirman, S., & Rodríguez-Nieto, C.A. Transformation of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Non-Euclidean Geometry Concept Through E-Learning Based on the Theory of Didactic Situations Using a Multiphase Mixed Method. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(2), 578–597, 2025. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i2.42976
[42]Buda, J. "Integrating Non-Euclidean Geometry into High School" Honors Thesis, 173, 2017. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/honors-thesis/173
[43]Cardinali, A. Teaching Non-Euclidean Geometries in High School: An Experimental Study. PhD Dissertation, 2023. https://hdl.handle.net/11581/483528
[44]Abdullaeva, N. Illumination of the Formation of Pedagogical Responsibility in Future Teachers in Theoretical Sources. International Journal of Pedagogics, 2(12), 39–43, 2022. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume02Issue12-09
[45]Djalilova, Z.O. Adapting Teaching Methods to Modern Educational Trends: Pedagogical Aspect. International Journal of Pedagogics, 3(10), 72–77, 2023. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijp/Volume03Issue10-14
[46]Struchens, M.E., Harris, K.A., & Martin, W.G. Assessing geometric and measurement understanding using manipulatives. Mathematics Teaching in Middle School, 6(7), 402-405, 2001.
[47]Gerstein, L.J. Introduction to Mathematical Structures and Proofs. New York: Springer, 2012.
[48]Krons, A. Visualization in Astronomy at General School. In Gamtamokslinis Ugdymas, Natural Science Education,pp. 31–33, 2009. https://oaji.net/articles/2014/514-1394524667.pdf
[49]Kurudirek, A., & Akca, H. On the Imaginary Geometry. Open Access Library Journal, 2: e1433, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1101433
[50]Shapovalova, N., & Panchenko, L. Features of teaching hyperbolic geometry to enhance the competence of future teachers of mathematics and physics. Education. Innovation. Practice, 1 (2), 44-48, 2017.
[51]Biró, C., & Powers, R.C. A strong triangle inequality in hyperbolic geometry. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.04033, 2015. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1507.04033
[52]Kara, S. The Effects of Web 2.0 Tools on Foundation English Students` Success Rates at A Private University in Iraq. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(1), 22-36, 2023. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i1p22
[53]Kragh, H. “Poincaré and Cosmic Space: Curved or not?” Philosophia Scientiæ. http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/4100, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.4100
[54]Walter, J., Ontrup, J., Wessling, D., & Ritter, H. Interactive visualization and navigation in large data collections using the hyperbolic space. In Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 355-362). IEEE, 2003.
[55]Celik, B., Bilgin, R., & Yildiz, Y. The views of instructors in foreign language teaching with distance education model during the Covid 19 pandemic process: A study at Tishk International University in Erbil, Iraq. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 9(1), 148-176, 2022. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v9i1p148
[56]Küçük, T. Technology integrated teaching and its positive and negative impacts on education. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(1), 46-57, 2023. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i1p46
[57]Bilgin, R. Exploring Students’ Perceptions Towards 21st Century Skills Through Novel Applications: A Comparative Study among EFL Learners in Iraq. Arab World English Journal, 15(1): 283-297, 2024. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no1.18
[58]Laptev, B. Lobachevsky geometry, its history and meaning. Moscow: Knowledge, 1976.
[59]Tennant, R.F. Constructing tessellations and creating hyperbolic art. Symmetry: Culture and Science, 3, 367-383, 1992.
[60]Levina, A. Systematic Symmetries: An Inquiry Into the Infinite Via the Works of MC Escher, 2011. (Bachelor's Thesis, Kent State University).
[61]Casey, S., & Geskin, S. Technical Report No. 2013-3: From Complex Analysis and Group Theory to Geometry and Art (AU-CAS-MathStats). American University (Washington, D.C.). Report, 2013. https://doi.org/10.17606/evsv-qc54
[62]Escher, M.C., Wilson, J., & Vermeulen, J.W. Escher on Escher: Exploring the Infinite. New York, NY: H.N. Abrams, 1986.
[63]Dunham, D., & Shier, L. Creating non-euclidean art with craft technologies. In Bridges 2020 Conference Proceedings, pp. 75-82, 2020. Tessellations Publishing.
[64]Thuneberg, H., Salmi, H., & Fenyvesi, K. Hands‐On Math and Art Exhibition Promoting Science Attitudes and Educational Plans. Hindawi Education Research International, 2017(1), 9132791. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9132791
[65]Stahl, N.A., & King, J.R. Expanding Approaches for Research: Understanding and Using Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), 26–28, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45381095
[66]Lénárt, I. Paper geometry vs orange geometry–Comparative geometry on the plane and the sphere. Bundoora, Australia.: Mathematical Association of Victoria, 2009.
[67]Lénárt, I. Gauss, Bolyai, Lobachevsky—in General Education? (Hyperbolic Geometry as Part of the Mathematics Curriculum). In Proceedings of Bridges 2010: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Culture (pp. 223-230).
[68]Lénárt, I. Hyperbolic geometry in general education: comprehending the incomprehensible. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1946 012005, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1946/1/012005
[69]Alexandrov, A.D. Geometry as an element of culture Proc. of the 7th International. Congress on Mathematical Education ICME-7 ed Gaulin D H C, Hodgson B R, Wheeler D H and Egsgard J C (Qu´ebec: Les Presses de l’Universit´e Laval) pp.365-368, 1992.
[70]Khatamov, I.M. The Trajectory of Organizing and Teaching a Facultative Course on Non-Euclidean Geometries at School. American Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 3(01), 06–14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajast/Volume03Issue01-02
[71]Kurudirek, A. Methods of using non-Euclidean geometry concepts in the educational process. Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics, 5(1): 1-5, 2022.
[72]Nazarovich, S.T., & Kurudirek, A. An Overview of Existing Problems in Teaching the Science “Fundamentals of Geometry”. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 11(2), 91-106, 2024. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v11i2p91