Using FAHP in the Educational and Vocational Guidance

Full Text (PDF, 1066KB), PP.36-43

Views: 0 Downloads: 0


Essaid EL HAJI 1,* Abdellah Azmani 1 Mohamed El Harzli 2

1. Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, Department of Computer Science, Tangier, Morocco

2. Faculty of Sciences and Technologies, Department of Electrical Engineering, Tangier, Morocco

* Corresponding author.


Received: 30 Oct. 2018 / Revised: 10 Nov. 2018 / Accepted: 17 Nov. 2018 / Published: 8 Dec. 2018

Index Terms

FAHP, Multi-criteria Decision making, MCDM Methods, vocational guidance


This paper presents the use of the FAHPmethod (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process) to help young people choose the most appropriate activity sectors for their profile. This choice is based on three criteria: Professional interests, professional sub-interests and personality traits. This work is a part of a global context aiming to apply the Multi-criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods in the vocational guidance according to the process schematized in Figure 3.

Cite This Paper

Essaid EL HAJI, Abdellah Azmani, Mohamed El Harzli, "Using FAHP in the Educational and Vocational Guidance", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.10, No.12, pp. 36-43, 2018. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2018.12.05


[1]S. Davies and N. Guppy, “Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education” Social Forces, vol. 75, n° %14, p. 1417–1438, 1997.
[2]J.C Simpson, “Segregated by subject: racial differences in the factors influencing academic major between European Americans, Asian Americans, and African, Hispanic, and native Americans” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 72, n° %11, p. 63–100, 2001.
[3]K.M. Galotti, Making, “A Major real-life decision: college students choosing an academic major”, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 91, n° %12, p. 379–387, 1999.
[4]Coperthwaite, “The effect of self-esteem, locus of control, and background factors on college students’ choice of an academic major” chez Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Connecticut, USA, 1994.
[5]P. J. R. N. E. Betz, “ Current research on parallel measures of interests and confidence for basic dimensions of vocational activity” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 14, n° %11, p. 56–76, 2006.
[6]R. M. S. J. J. L. F. T. L. a. L. W. G. J. W. Lounsbury, “Personality characteristics of business majors as de fined by the Big Five and narrow personality traits” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 84, n° %14, p. 200–206, 2009.
[7]K.Leppel, “Race, Hispanic ethnicity, and the future of the college business major in the United Sates” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 76, n° %14, pp. 209–215,, 2001.
[8]N. A. S. a. J. L. N. C. Ware, “Undergraduate woman: who chooses a science major?” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 56, n° %11, p. 73–84 , 1985.
[9]M. E. E. EL HAJI, “Using AHP method for educational and vocational guidance,” I.J. Information Technology and Computer Science, 2017, vol. 1, pp. 9-17, 2017.
[10]R. B. W. B. a. W. T. J. Johnson, “A note on right-left asymmetry in an eigenvector ranking procedure” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 19, n° %11, pp. 61-64., 1979.
[11]L. C. L. Lima Junior, “A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. App” Appl. Soft Comput, vol. 21, p. 194–209, 2014.
[12]S. J. R. M. P. Avikal, “A Kano model, AHP and M-TOPSIS method-based technique for disassembly line balancing under fuzzy environment.” Appl. Soft Comput, vol. 25, p. 519–529, 2014.
[13]L. Zadeh, “Fuzzy Sets” Information Control, vol. 8, pp. 338-353., 1965.
[14]L. L.-J. F. C. L. Osiro, “A fuzzy logic approach to supplier valuation for development.” Int. J. Prod. Econ, vol. 153, p. 95–112, 2014.
[15]Q. F. J. Hung, “Prioritizing the Factor Weights Affecting Tourism Performance by FAHP” .Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag., n° %11, 2013.
[16]X. H. Y. D. Y. M. S. Deng, “Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers” Expert Syst. Appl , vol. 41, p. 156–167, 2014.
[17]W. T. S. D. 2. Jalao,”A stochastic AHP decision making methodology for imprecise preferences” Inf. Sci, vol. 270, p. 192–203, 2014.
[18]a. M. L. P. D. Guglielmi, “The Professional Interests According to Holland’s Hexagonal Model Structures and Gender Difference”OSP, vol. 33, n° %13, pp. 409-427, 2004.
[19]B. Stevanovic and N. Mosconi, “Les représentations des métiers des adolescent(e-s) scolarisé(e-s) dans l’enseignement secondaire,” Revue française de pédagogie [En ligne], vol. 161, 2007.
[20]J. P. R. a. F. H. B. M. Lisa Larson, “Meta-analyses of Big Six Interests and Big Five Personality Factors” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 61, p. 217–239, 2002.
[21]L. R. Goldberg, “An alternative description of personality: The Big-Five factor structure” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 59, pp. 1216–1229,, 1990.
[22]M.Ziegler, “Big Five facets as predictor of job training performance: The role of specific job demands” Learning and individual Differences, vol. 29, pp. 1-7, 2014.
[23]H.-J. Zimmermann, “Fuzzy set theory” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat., p. 317–332, 2010.
[24]M. E. H. Essaid EL HAJI, “Using AHP Method for Educational and Vocational Guidance” nternational Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (IJITCS), vol. 9, n° %11, pp. 9-17, 2017.