International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (IJITCS)
IJITCS Vol. 18, No. 4, 8 Aug. 2026
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 735KB)
From Sybil to Zero-Knowledge: A Systematic Review of Blockchain Data Sharing Solutions
PDF (735KB), PP.1-16
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Index Terms
Blockchain Security, Sybil Attacks, Front-Running, Multi-Signature, Key Management, GDPR
Abstract
Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative tool for secure data sharing across decentralised systems, particularly in finance, healthcare, and governance. However, despite its promise, the widespread adoption of blockchain platforms remains constrained by unresolved security threats and architecture-specific vulnerabilities. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) that critically evaluates the security risks and countermeasures associated with blockchain-based data sharing models. The review focuses on three widely referenced platforms, Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric, and MedRec, chosen for their relevance to public, permissioned, and healthcare-oriented blockchain deployments, respectively. The review analyzed 30 peer-reviewed publications from 2018 to 2025 sourced from IEEE Xplore, SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, and other digital libraries. Empirical insights from the reviewed literature indicate that Sybil attacks remain prevalent on public blockchains, although adaptive Proof-of-Stake protocols are reported to reduce their success rate considerably. Front-running and Miner Extractable Value–related behaviors are frequently observed in Ethereum-based decentralised finance ecosystems, often resulting in significant financial losses. Unauthorised access persists as a major concern, particularly for software wallets, which are commonly exposed to phishing and malware attacks. The findings underscore unique trade-offs across platforms: Ethereum supports transparency but is prone to transaction manipulation; Hyperledger ensures strong access control yet faces insider threat challenges; and MedRec enhances patient privacy but lacks robust mobile integration. This study provides a structured synthesis of existing threats, platform-level responses, and design trade-offs, offering guidance for stakeholders aiming to strengthen security in blockchain-based data-sharing infrastructures.
Cite This Paper
Godwin Mandinyenya, Vusumuzi Malele, "From Sybil to Zero-Knowledge: A Systematic Review of Blockchain Data Sharing Solutions", International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science(IJITCS), Vol.18, No.4, pp.1-16, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijitcs.2026.04.01
Reference
[1]S. Nakamoto, ‘Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System’. 2008.
[2]A. Gervais, G. O. Karame, K. Wüst, V. Glykantzis, H. Ritzdorf, and S. Capkun, ‘On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work Blockchains’, in Proc. ACM CCS, 2016, pp. 3–16.
[3]P. Daian and others, ‘Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning in Decentralised Exchanges, Miner Extractable Value, and Consensus Instability’, in IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2020, pp. 910–927. doi: 10.1109/SP40000.2020.00031.
[4]S. Eskandari and J. Clark, ‘On the Feasibility of Decentralised MEV Prevention’, in FC 2022 Workshops, LNCS 13459, Springer, 2022, pp. 93–111.
[5]L. Luu and others, ‘SmartPool: Practical Decentralised Pooling’, in USENIX Security Symposium, 2017, pp. 477–492.
[6]M. Al-Bassam, A. Sonnino, S. Bano, and G. Danezis, ‘Chainspace: A Sharded Smart Contracts Platform’, in NDSS, 2018.
[7]V. Buterin, ‘A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralised Application Platform’. 2014.
[8]Chainalysis, ‘Crypto Crime Report’. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://go.chainalysis.com
[9]Y. Sompolinsky and A. Zohar, ‘PHANTOM: A Scalable BlockDAG Protocol’, in Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 2019.
[10]M. Conti, S. S. Kumar, and C. Lal, ‘A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues of Bitcoin’, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3416–3452, 2018.
[11]C. Reitwiessner, ‘Solidity Documentation’. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://docs.soliditylang.org
[12]D. Boneh and V. Shoup, ‘A Graduate Course in Applied Cryptography’. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://crypto.stanford.edu/~dabo/cryptobook
[13]A. Shamir, ‘How to Share a Secret’, Communications of the ACM, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 612–613, 1979.
[14]Intel, ‘Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX)’. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.intel.com
[15]N. Atzei, M. Bartoletti, and T. Cimoli, ‘A Survey of Attacks on Ethereum Smart Contracts’, in International Conference on Principles of Security and Trust, Springer, 2017.
[16]D. Chaum, ‘Zero-Knowledge Proofs and Their Applications’, IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 12–17, 2018.
[17]A. Mühle, A. Grüner, T. Gayvoronskaya, and C. Meinel, ‘A Survey on Essential Components of a Self-Sovereign Identity’, Computer Science Review, vol. 30, pp. 1–27, 2018.
[18]M. Alammary, S. Alhazmi, M. Almasri, and S. Gillani, ‘Blockchain-Based Applications in Education: A Systematic Review’, Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 2400–2421, 2019.
[19]B. Yu, D. Yang, and K. Liu, ‘A Scalable Blockchain-Based Platform for Secure Personal Data Management’, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 123944–123956, 2020.
[20]A. Dorri, S. S. Kanhere, R. Jurdak, and others, ‘Blockchain: A Distributed Solution to Automotive Security and Privacy’, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 119–125, 2017.
[21]Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H. Dai, X. Chen, and H. Wang, ‘Blockchain Challenges and Opportunities: A Survey’, IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 144321–144356, 2020.
[22]M. Ahmed and R. Dharaskar, ‘Blockchain and GDPR: How to Reconcile the Irreconcilable’, IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Review, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 23–31, 2021.
[23]J. Glöckler and others, ‘A Systematic Review of Identity and Access Management in Blockchain Systems’, Business and Information Systems Engineering, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 421–440, 2024.
[24]R. Belchior, A. Vasconcelos, S. Guerreiro, and M. Correia, ‘A survey on blockchain interoperability: Past, present, and future trends’, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1–34, 2020.
[25]K. Christidis and M. Devetsikiotis, ‘Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things’, IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 2292–2303, 2016.
[26]W. F. Programme, ‘Building Blocks Project: Blockchain for Humanitarian Aid’. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://innovation.wfp.org/project/building-blocks
[27]N. Kshetri, ‘Blockchain and international standardization: Challenges and opportunities’, IEEE IT Professional, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 2021.
[28]T. Gräning and B. Müller, ‘ISO/TC 307 and global blockchain governance’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Governance, 2019, pp. 103–115.
[29]X. Wang, L. Chen, and K. Li, ‘Attribute-Based Encryption for Blockchain Access Control’, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 154, p. 102535, 2020.
[30]J. Albrecht and I. Coyne, ‘Blockchain regulation in emerging markets: A review of ISO standard relevance’, Journal of Information Systems, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 121–139, 2023.