Reza Andrea; Hasbi Sjamsir; Fajar Ramadhani; Ita Arfyanti

Enterprise Architecture for E-Government Development Using TOGAF ADM 9.2 in Simpang Pasir Village

PDF (1578KB), PP.18-33

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Reza Andrea ^1,2 Hasbi Sjamsir ² Fajar Ramadhani ³ Ita Arfyanti ^4,*

1. Software Engineering Technology, Polytechnic of Agricultural, Samarinda, 75131, Indonesia

2. Education Management, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia

3. Accounting Information System, Samarinda State Agricultural Polytechnic, 75131, Indonesia

4. STMIK Widya Cipta Dharma, Samarinda, 75123, Indonesia

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2025.06.02

Received: 19 Oct. 2024 / Revised: 18 Mar. 2024 / Accepted: 1 Aug. 2025 / Published: 8 Dec. 2025

Index Terms

Enterprise Architecture, E-Government, Enterprise Architecture Scorecard, Sub-district Government, TOGAF ADM

Abstract

Effective information technology governance is essential for improving public service delivery and administrative efficiency at the village government level. This research focuses on Simpang Pasir Village in Palaran District, Samarinda City, East Kalimantan Province, aiming to establish a foundation for an electronic-based government system (e-government). By employing the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM) version 9.2, this study systematically designs an enterprise architecture encompassing business, data, application, and technology domains. The process spans from the preliminary phase to migration planning, with gap analysis conducted to align baseline and target architectures. Key outputs include the development of integrated systems for administrative tasks and digital public services, supported by cloud server technology to ensure scalability and efficiency. Validation of the design using the Enterprise Architecture Scorecard yielded a score of 82.27%, indicating strong alignment with Simpang Pasir Village's objectives and readiness for implementation. This initiative addresses critical challenges, including data integration, transparent governance, and improved public services. The research outcomes provide a comprehensive roadmap for transitioning to e-government, supporting the village's mission to advance IT-based governance while fostering self-reliance and community empowerment. The findings contribute valuable insights for digitally transforming rural governments, positioning Simpang Pasir Village as a model for innovation and modernization.

Cite This Paper

Reza Andrea, Hasbi Sjamsir, Fajar Ramadhani, Ita Arfyanti, "Enterprise Architecture for E-Government Development Using TOGAF ADM 9.2 in Simpang Pasir Village", International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business(IJIEEB), Vol.17, No.6, pp. 18-33, 2025. DOI:10.5815/ijieeb.2025.06.02

Reference

[1]S. Sunardi, H. Haryanto, and N. Nurlinah, “Disparity Between E-Government and Human Resources in The Village,” J. Ilmu Sos., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 17–34, 2019, doi: 10.14710/jis.18.1.2019.17-34.
[2]D. Hertati and Nurhadi, “Web-Based Government Information System Implementation Model For Village Government,” Arch. Bus. Res., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 414–425, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.77.6864.
[3]P. Adjei-Bamfo, T. Maloreh-Nyamekye, and A. Ahenkan, “The role of e-government in sustainable public procurement in developing countries: A systematic literature review,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 142, no. November 2018, pp. 189–203, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.001.
[4]A. Suhendra and A. Santiko, “Governance Through Electronic-based Information System by Papua Provincial Government,” Int. J. Reg. Innov., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 43–50, 2023, doi: 10.52000/ijori.v2i3.65.
[5]M. H. Koniyo, I. A. D. Giriantari, M. Sudarma, and N. M. A. E. D. Wirastuti, “Electronic government system measurement model: a systematic testing of e-government implementation,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 845–856, 2023, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v32.i2.pp845-856.
[6]A and R. Diwilaga, “Journal of Government Civil Society,” J. Gov. Civ. Soc., vol. 3, no. September, 2019.
[7]M. Zioło et al., “E-Government Development in European Countries: Socio-Economic and Environmental Aspects,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 23, pp. 1–17, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15238870.
[8]R. Miskiewicz, “Clean and Affordable Energy within Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Governance Digitalization,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 24, pp. 27–39, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15249571.
[9]T. R. Sari, E. Rahmawati, and H. Harafani, “TOGAF ADM to Improve The Promotion of Farm Edu-Tourism in Pondok Rangon Area,” SinkrOn, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 280, 2019, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v3i2.10108.
[10]Sari, S. P., Andrea, R., & Beze , H. (2024). Enterprise Architecture Design of PT Hariansyah Karya Group Information System Using TOGAF ADM. Tepian, 5(3), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.51967/tepian.v5i3.3084
[11]U. Ulmi, A. P. G. Putra, Y. D. P. Ginting, I. L. Laily, F. Humani, and Y. Ruldeviyani, “Enterprise Architecture Planning for Enterprise University Information System Using the TOGAF Architecture Development Method,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 879, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/879/1/012073.
[12]Y. Gong, J. Yang, and X. Shi, “Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101487.
[13]L. Sofyana and A. R. Putera, “Business architecture planning with TOGAF framework,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1375, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1375/1/012056.
[14]M. Sidiq and I. D. Sumitra, “Strategic Information Systems Planning Using the Togaf Architecture Development Method,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 662, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/662/2/022057.
[15]D. Dumitriu and M. A. M. Popescu, “Enterprise architecture framework design in IT management,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 46, pp. 932–940, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.011.
[16]S. Yamamoto, Q. Zhi, and Z. Zhou, “Aspect analysis towards archimate diagrams,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 159, pp. 973–980, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.264.
[17]Z. Zhou, Q. Zhi, S. Morisaki, and S. Yamamoto, “A Systematic Literature Review on Enterprise Architecture Visualization Methodologies,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 96404–96427, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995850.
[18]R. A. Hermawan and I. D. Sumitra, “Designing Enterprise Architecture Using TOGAF Architecture Development Method,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 662, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/662/4/042021.
[19]H. D, “Analyzing Digital Transformation using the Zachman Framework and SysML,” Jung J. Cult. Psyche, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 6–9, 2020. Available: https://dair.nps.edu/handle/123456789/4374.
[20]I. Saepurrahman and I. D. Sumitra, “Designing Enterprise Architecture for Sports Information System Platform Using the Open Group Architecture Framework Architecture Development Method,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 662, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/662/4/042013.
[21]N. Zulfarian and I. D. Rosiyadi, “Designing Enterprise Architecture for Academics Information System Platform using the Open Group Architecture Framework Architecture Development Method,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 879, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/879/1/012066.
[22]S. Kotusev, “The TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition: What’s New?,” no. January, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://kotusev.com
[23]Y. Jiang, M. A. Jeusfeld, M. Mosaad, and N. Oo, “Enterprise architecture modeling for cybersecurity analysis in critical infrastructures — A systematic literature review,” Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot., vol. 46, no. September, pp. 1–21, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2024.100700.
[24]Q. Zhi and Z. Zhou, “Empirically modeling enterprise architecture using archimate,” Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 357–374, 2022, doi: 10.32604/CSSE.2022.018759.
[25]S. Masnunah and E. Leander Hadisaputro, “Business Architecture Planning in Telkom Penajam Plasa,” Devot. J. Res. Community Serv., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 774–782, 2022, doi: 10.36418/dev.v3i08.180.
[26]N. Q. Nada, S. Wibowo, and M. Novita, “Designing Enterprise Architecture in Koperasi Karyawan using TOGAF Architecture Development,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 835, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/835/1/012049.
[27]Siswanto and I. D. Sumitra, “Designing of enterprise architecture for vocational high school information system using TOGAF Architecture Development Method,” Int. J. Educ. Inf. Technol. Others, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 306–314, 2020, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3975539.
[28]H. Supriyadi and E. Amalia, “Development of enterprise architecture in senior high school using TOGAF as framewrok,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 8–14, 2019, doi: 10.13189/ujer.2019.071402.
[29]J. vom Brocke, A. Hevner, and A. Maedche, “Introduction to Design Science Research,” no. November, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46781-4_1.
[30]K. R. R. E. Ismagilova, L. Hughes, Y. K. Dwivedi, “Smart cities Advances in research An information systems perspective 2019.pdf,” no. 2019, pp. 88–100, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004.
[31]U. Ulmi, A. P. G. Putra, Y. D. P. Ginting, I. L. Laily, F. Humani, and Y. Ruldeviyani, “Enterprise Architecture Planning for Enterprise University Information System Using the TOGAF Architecture Development Method,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 879, no. 1, p. 012073, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/879/1/012073.
[32]J. . Millard, M. . Manzoni, and S. . Schade, Impact of digital transformation on public governance : new forms of policy-making and the provision of innovative, people-centric and inclusive public services. Publications Office of the European Union, 2023, doi : 10.2760/204686.

International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business (IJIEEB)