A Bibliometric Analysis on Chatbot Application in Education

Full Text (PDF, 789KB), PP.1-13

Views: 0 Downloads: 0


Lily Edinam Bensah 1,* Fati Tahiru 1 Carlos Ankora 1 Noble Arden Kuadey 1

1. Department of Computer Science, Ho Technical University, P. O. Box HP 217, Ghana

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2023.06.01

Received: 19 May 2023 / Revised: 10 Jun. 2023 / Accepted: 15 Jul. 2023 / Published: 8 Dec. 2023

Index Terms

Chatbots, Bibliometric analysis, Education, Co-authorship, Co-occurrence, Artificial intelligence


A bibliometric analysis study investigating chatbots' current state and developments in education research has not been adequately addressed in literature. Thus, this study highlights the current state, emerging research trends and directions of chatbots in education using bibliometric analysis. The significance of the study is to provide insights into the most recent developments of chatbots application in education and future research directions for academics and practitioners. A bibliometric analysis of publications on chatbots in education published between 2012 and 2022 was conducted. A total of 759 publications were collected from the Scopus database for the bibliometric analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was adopted to identify and screen the dataset. VOSviewer (version 1.6.18) was used to perform the following network analysis: co-authorship and co-occurrence. Also, Bibliometrix was used for the descriptive statistics of the bibliometric data and the publication trend. The study’s findings showed that fewer studies have been conducted from the African region on chatbot education research. Researchers from the United Kingdom, United States, Australia, China, India, Greece, Japan, Vietnam, Malaysia, and United Arab Emirates have collaborated significantly in chatbot education research. Also, the main keyword occurrences in research on chatbots in education are chatbots, students, artificial intelligence, natural language processing, education, and learning. The trends indicate a steady increase in research on chatbots over the past decade.

Cite This Paper

Lily Edinam Bensah, Fati Tahiru, Carlos Ankora, Noble Arden Kuadey, "A Bibliometric Analysis on Chatbot Application in Education", International Journal of Education and Management Engineering (IJEME), Vol.13, No.6, pp. 1-13, 2023. DOI:10.5815/ijeme.2023.06.01


[1]H. D. Nguyen, T. V. Tran, X. T. Pham, A. T. Huynh, V. T. Pham, and D. Nguyen, “Design Intelligent Educational Chatbot for Information Retrieval based on Integrated Knowledge Bases,” IAENG Int J Comput Sci, vol. 49, no. 2, 2022.
[2]G. Molnar and Z. Szuts, “The Role of Chatbots in Formal Education,” SISY 2018 - IEEE 16th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Proceedings, pp. 197–201, 2018, doi: 10.1109/SISY.2018.8524609.
[3]I. C. Hsu and J. De Yu, “A medical Chatbot using machine learning and natural language understanding,” Multimed Tools Appl, pp. 23777–23799, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-12820-4.
[4]C. W. Okonkwo and A. Ade-Ibijola, “Python-bot: A chatbot for teaching python programming,” Engineering Letters, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2021.
[5]S. Pede and M. L. Saini, “A Brief Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Scopus and WoS databases on Blockchain Technology in Healthcare Domain,” Library Philosophy and Practice, vol. 2021, pp. 1–27, 2021.
[6]D. Hamam, The New Teacher Assistant: A Review of Chatbots’ Use in Higher Education, vol. 1421. Springer International Publishing, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78645-8_8.
[7]S. Yang and C. Evans, “Opportunities and challenges in using AI chatbots in higher education,” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 79–83, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3371647.3371659.
[8]M. A. Kuhail, H. Al Katheeri, J. Negreiros, A. Seffah, and O. Alfandi, “Engaging Students With a Chatbot-Based Academic Advising System,” Int J Hum Comput Interact, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–27, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2074645.
[9]K. Gaglo, B. M. Degboe, G. M. Kossingou, and S. Ouya, “Proposal of conversational chatbots for educational remediation in the context of covid-19,” International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT, vol. 2022-Febru, pp. 354–358, 2022, doi: 10.23919/ICACT53585.2022.9728860.
[10]C. W. Okonkwo and A. Ade-Ibijola, “Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, p. 100033, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033.
[11]M. Ashok, K. Ramasamy, G. Snehitha, and S. R. Keerthi, “A Systematic Survey of Cognitive Chatbots in Personalized Learning Framework,” 2021 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking, WiSPNET 2021, pp. 241–245, 2021, doi: 10.1109/WiSPNET51692.2021.9419403.
[12]S. Wollny, J. Schneider, D. Di Mitri, J. Weidlich, M. Rittberger, and H. Drachsler, “Are We There Yet? - A Systematic Literature Review on Chatbots in Education,” Front Artif Intell, vol. 4, no. July, pp. 1–18, 2021, doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.654924.
[13]G. Caldarini, S. Jaf, and K. McGarry, “A Literature Survey of Recent Advances in Chatbots,” Information (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 0–22, 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13010041.
[14]R. Winkler and M. Soellner, “Unleashing the Potential of Chatbots in Education: A State-Of-The-Art Analysis,” Academy of Management Proceedings, vol. 2018, no. 1, p. 15903, 2018, doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2018.15903abstract.
[15]M. Ali, R. Rahimi, F. Okumus, and J. Liu, “Annals of Tourism Research Bibliometric studies in tourism,” vol. 61, pp. 180–198, 2016.
[16]D. Kalibatiene and J. Miliauskaitė, “A systematic mapping with bibliometric analysis on information systems using ontology and fuzzy logic,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11073003.
[17]K. C. Li and B. T. M. Wong, “Research landscape of smart education: a bibliometric analysis,” Interactive Technology and Smart Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 3–19, 2022, doi: 10.1108/ITSE-05-2021-0083.
[18]M. Pears and S. Konstantinidis, “Bibliometric Analysis of Chatbots in Health-Trend Shifts and Advancements in Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Conversational Agents,” vol. 2020, pp. 494–498, 2022, doi: 10.3233/shti220125.
[19]M. Kamran, H. Ullah, W. Nisar, M. Farooq, and S. Rehman, “Blockchain and Internet of Things : A bibliometric study ✩,” vol. 81, 2020.
[20]X. Ding and Z. Yang, “Knowledge mapping of platform research: a visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace,” Electronic Commerce Research, no. 0123456789, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7.
[21]N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer,” Scientometrics, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 1053–1070, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7.
[22]Y. Lin and Z. Yu, “A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence chatbots in educational contexts,” Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 2023, doi: 10.1108/ITSE-12-2022-0165.
[23]F. Tahiru and S. Agbesi, “The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Education,” in Digital Technology Advancements in Knowledge Management , 2021, pp. 187–194. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-6792-0.ch010.
[24]S. F. Ahmad, M. M. Alam, M. K. Rahmat, M. S. Mubarik, and S. I. Hyder, “Academic and Administrative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031101.
[25]L. Chen, P. Chen, and Z. Lin, “Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 75264–75278, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.
[26]F. Tahiru, “AI in education: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT), vol. 23, no. 1. pp. 1–20, 2021. doi: 10.4018/JCIT.2021010101.
[27]X. Zhai et al., “A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020,” Complexity, vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/8812542.
[28]R. Bucea-Manea-țoniş et al., “Artificial Intelligence Potential in Higher Education Institutions Enhanced Learning Environment in Romania and Serbia,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14105842.
[29]E. Hannan and S. Liu, “AI: new source of competitiveness in higher education,” Competitiveness Review, 2021, doi: 10.1108/CR-03-2021-0045.
[30]J. Qu, Y. Zhao, and Y. Xie, “Artificial intelligence leads the reform of education models,” Syst Res Behav Sci, no. April, pp. 581–588, 2022, doi: 10.1002/sres.2864.
[31]M. L. Owoc, A. Sawicka, and P. Weichbroth, “Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Education: Benefits, Challenges and Strategies of Implementation,” IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol, vol. 599, no. August, pp. 37–58, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85001-2_4.
[32]A. McFarland, “10 Best AI Tools for Education,” https://www.unite.ai/10-best-ai-tools-for-education/, 2022, Accessed: Aug. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.unite.ai/10-best-ai-tools-for-education/
[33]P. Smutny and P. Schreiberova, “Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger,” Comput Educ, vol. 151, no. June 2019, p. 103862, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862.
[34]Y. Chen, S. Jensen, L. J. Albert, S. Gupta, T. Lee, and L. J. Albert, “Artificial Intelligence ( AI ) Student Assistants in the Classroom : Designing Chatbots to Support Student Success,” Information Systems Frontiers, no. 0123456789, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4.
[35]G. Dimitriadis, “Evolution in Education: Chatbots,” Homo Virtualis, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 47, 2020, doi: 10.12681/homvir.23456.
[36]S. Hobert, Individualized Learning Patterns Require Individualized Conversations – Data-Driven Insights from the Field on How Chatbots Instruct Students in Solving Exercises, vol. 13171 LNCS. Springer International Publishing, 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94890-0_4.
[37]M. S. Lim, S. B. Ho, and I. Chai, Design and Functionality of a University Academic Advisor Chatbot as an Early Intervention to Improve Students’ Academic Performance, vol. 724. Springer Singapore, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-981-33-4069-5_15.
[38]S. Tegos and S. Demetriadis, “International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Conversational Agents Improve Peer Learning through Building on Prior Knowledge,” Source: Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 99–111, 2017.
[39]R. Winkler, S. Hobert, A. Salovaara, M. Söllner, and J. M. Leimeister, “Sara, the Lecturer: Improving Learning in Online Education with a Scaffolding-Based Conversational Agent,” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376781.
[40]J. Baas, M. Schotten, A. Plume, G. Côté, and R. Karimi, “Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies,” Quantitative Science Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 377–386, 2020, doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00019.
[41]S. Neelam and S. K. Sood, “A Scientometric Review of Global Research on Smart Disaster Management,” IEEE Trans Eng Manag, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 317–329, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2020.2972288.
[42]M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” The BMJ, vol. 372, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
[43]P. Song and X. Wang, “A bibliometric analysis of worldwide educational artificial intelligence research development in recent twenty years,” Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 473–486, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12564-020-09640-2.
[44]V. N. J. Eck and L. Waltman, “Visualizing Bibliometric Networks,” in Measuring Scholarly Impact, Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, and D. Wolfram, Eds., Springer, 2014, pp. 285–320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13.
[45]M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” J Informetr, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
[46]F. Clarizia, F. Colace, M. Lombardi, F. Pascale, and D. Santaniello, Chatbot: An education support system for student, vol. 11161 LNCS. Springer International Publishing, 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-01689-0_23.