Ajay Kumar; P. V. Rajaraman; Albins Paul; Hasna Hameed

A Comparative Analysis of Conventional Methods for Sensor-Driven Spatial Interpolation for Air Quality Monitoring

PDF (965KB), PP.169-184

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Ajay Kumar ^1,* P. V. Rajaraman ² Albins Paul ¹ Hasna Hameed ¹

1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Adi Shankara Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kalady, India

2. Department of AI & DS, Adi Shankara Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kalady, Kerala, India

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijem.2026.04.13

Received: 23 Apr. 2026 / Revised: 25 May 2026 / Accepted: 13 Jul. 2026 / Published: 8 Aug. 2026

Index Terms

Air quality monitoring, spatial interpolation techniques, real-time LoRa-Based sensor system

Abstract

Accurate air quality mapping in regions with sparse sensor deployment remains a challenge due to high infrastructure costs. While modern literature increasingly favors heavy, cloud-based Artificial Intelligence frameworks that assume dense input networks, the operational boundaries and mathematical fidelity of lean, edge-computed spatial interpolation models in ultra-sparse (e.g., 5-node) live frameworks remain poorly defined. This work presents a case-study comparative evaluation of conventional spatial interpolation techniques for estimating pollutant concentrations in sensor-limited environments. Eight interpolation methods, namely Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Kriging, Empirical Bayesian Kriging (EBK), Radial Basis Function (RBF), Nearest Neighbor (NN), Akima, Piecewise Cubic Hermite Interpolation (PCHIP), and Cubic Spline (CS), were analyzed using real-time environmental data collected from five locations in Kalady, Kerala, India. The interpolation performance was evaluated using RMSE and MAE metrics through leave-one-out validation. Results indicate that, within this deployment, Kriging and IDW achieved the best estimation accuracy for PM2.5, PM10, humidity, and temperature compared to the other methods evaluated. A LoRa-based sensing framework was also integrated to support low-power real-time environmental monitoring. As a single-region case study based on five monitoring nodes, the findings are specific to this deployment, and broader validation across additional stations and regions is identified as future work. The proposed approach demonstrates the feasibility of resource-efficient air quality estimation in regions with limited monitoring infrastructure.

Cite This Paper

Ajay Kumar, P. V. Rajaraman, Albins Paul, Hasna Hameed, "A Comparative Analysis of Conventional Methods for Sensor-Driven Spatial Interpolation for Air Quality Monitoring", International Journal of Engineering and Manufacturing (IJEM), Vol.16, No.4, pp.169-184, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijem.2026.04.13

Reference

[1]N. Harkat, A. Rahmane, and I. Bendjemila. The impact of industrial air pollution on the urban environment of Setif. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 12, no. 6, pages 9431–9439, December 2022. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.5256
[2]D. W. Wong, L. Yuan, and S. A. Perlin. Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for the estimation of air quality data.Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, vol. 14, no. 5, pages 404–415, September 2004 . https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500338
[3]H. Akima. A new method of interpolation and smooth curve fitting based on local procedures. Journal of the ACM, vol. 17, no. 4, pages 589–602, October 1970. https://doi.org/10.1145/321607.321609
[4]Baltazar and D. Claridge. Study of cubic splines and Fourier series as interpolation techniques for filling in short periods of missing building energy use and weather data. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 124, no. 1, pages 9–16, January 2002 . https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2189872
[5]F. N. Fritsch and R. E. Carlson. Monotone piecewise cubic interpolation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 17, no. 2, pages 238–246, April 1980 . https://doi.org/10.1137/0717021
[6]T. A. Driscoll and B. Fornberg. Interpolation in the limit of increasingly flat radial basis functions. SIAM Review, vol. 44, no. 2, pages  208–233, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(01)00295-4
[7]M. Zaresefat, R. Derakhshani, and J. Griffioen. Empirical Bayesian Kriging, a robust method for spatial data interpolation of a large groundwater quality dataset from the Western Netherlands. Water, vol. 16, no. 18, Art. no. 2581, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182581
[8]J. J. Kulez and R. W. Lee. “Method and system for monitoring environmental conditions,” U.S. Patent 7,835,859, Nov. 16, 2010. (patent; no DOI assigned)
[9]H. Thongzunhor and N. Pochai. Numerical simulations of a two-dimensional vertically averaged air pollution measurement in a street canyon. Environment and Ecology Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pages 107–115, February 2022. https://doi.org/10.13189/eer.2022.100110
[10]J. García‐Burgos, Y. Miquelajauregui, and E. Vega. Exploring the spatial distribution of air pollution and its association with socioeconomic status indicators in Mexico City. Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 22, July 2022 . https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215320
[11]Z. Jin, M. A. Velásquez Angel, and I. Mura. Enriched spatial analysis of air pollution: Application to the city of Bogotá, Colombia. Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 10, September 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.966560
[12]H. L. Brantley, G. S. W. Hagler, and E. S. Kimbrough. Mobile air monitoring data-processing strategies and effects on spatial air pollution trends, April 2014. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2169-2014
[13]L. E. Padilla, G. Q. Ma, D. Peters et al. New methods to derive street scale spatial patterns of air pollution from mobile monitoring. Atmospheric Environment, vol. 270, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118851
[14]D. Huang, B. He, L. Wei, and L. Sun. Impact of land cover on air pollution at different spatial scales in the vicinity of metropolitan areas. Ecological Indicators, vol. 132, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108313
[15]E. X. Neo, K. Hasikin, K. W. Lai et al. Artificial intelligence assisted air quality monitoring for smart city management. PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 9, May 2023.https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1306
[16]L. Liang, J. Daniels, C. Bailey et al. Integrating low cost sensor monitoring, satellite mapping, and geospatial artificial intelligence for intra urban air pollution predictions. Environmental Pollution, vol. 331, August 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121832
[17]S. Kalaiselvi, V. Anitha, V. Manimaran, and T. S. Lawrence. “Air quality prediction using multi-source remote sensing data integration with hybrid deep learning framework,” Scientific Reports, vol. 16, Art. no. 2688, 2025. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-025-32466-0.
[18] J. Chen, P. Nag, H. J. Wang, and Y. Sun. “Deep classifier kriging for probabilistic spatial prediction of air quality index,” arXiv preprint arXiv.2512.23474, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.23474
[19][19] J. Chen, H. Ye, H. Zhu, S. Fu, C. Wang, and C. Li. “RelMap: Reliable spatiotemporal sensor data visualization via imputative spatial interpolation,” arXiv preprint arXiv: .2508.012402025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.01240
[20]S. K. Abdulkareem, M. Alhadithi, and W. Amer, "Evaluating of spatial interpolation techniques for accurate air quality prediction: an overview," E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 633, article 07008, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202563307008
[21]H. Kebede, Z. Demissie, H. Tadesse, and A. Eshetu, "Spatial interpolation techniques comparison and evaluation: The case of ground-based gravity and elevation datasets of the central Main Ethiopian rift," Heliyon, vol. 10, article e32806, June 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32806.
[22]N. Lotrecchiano, D. Barletta, M. Poletto, and D. Sofia, "Comparison of spatial interpolation techniques for innovative air quality monitoring systems," Results in Engineering, vol. 17, article 100937, March 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100937.
[23]S. P. Nair, P. Arakkal, L. Janaki, M. Mohan, and A. M. Asokan, "Selection of interpolation technique for spatial distribution of prominent pollutant in a traffic induced polluted area," International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, vol. 38, no. 2, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2025.148761.
[24]V. Yadav and R. Ganguly, "Air quality assessment using spatial interpolation techniques for Kanpur city, India," IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1326, article 012127, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1326/1/012127.
[25]L. Garbagna, P. Melethil, L. B. Saheer, and M. M. Oghaz, "Spatial Interpolation of Air Quality: A UK Case Study," in Artificial Intelligence XLI: 44th SGAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AI 2024, Cambridge, UK, December 17–19, 2024, Proceedings, Part I, pp. 327-332, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77915-2_25
[26]M. Elbestar, S. G. Aly, and R. Ghannam, "Advances in Air Quality Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review of Algorithms for Imaging and Sensing Technologies," Advanced Sensor Research, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/adsr.202300207.

International Journal of Engineering and Manufacturing (IJEM)