IJEM Vol. 15, No. 5, 8 Oct. 2025
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 617KB)
PDF (617KB), PP.58-65
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Quadratic Polynomial Kernel, Support Vector Machine, Machine Learning, Local Binary Pattern Features, Medical Imaging
This study looks at how well a Support Vector Machine (SVM) with a quadratic polynomial kernel works for detecting Monkeypox. The SVM method is compared to other machine learning models like Neural Networks, KNN, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Naïve Bayes. By using features from medical images called Local Binary Patterns (LBP), the SVM model showed the best results, with 93.33% accuracy, 95.24% recall, 91.67% true negative rate, and 90.91% precision. The LBP features are used because they exhibit unique textural patterns that can distinguish Monkeypox and normal cases. The results show that the SVM with this kernel is good at telling the difference between Monkeypox and normal cases, making it a helpful tool for early detection in healthcare.
Michael Chi Seng Tang, Siew Ping Yiiong, Kee Chuong Ting, Sing Ling Ong, Marcella Peter, Khairunnisa Ibrahim, "Monkeypox Detection Using Support Vector Machine with a Quadratic Polynomial Kernel", International Journal of Engineering and Manufacturing (IJEM), Vol.15, No.5, pp. 58-65, 2025. DOI:10.5815/ijem.2025.05.05
[1]M. Tang, K. C. Ting, and N. H. Rashidi, “DenseNet201-Based Waste Material Classification Using Transfer Learning Approach,” Appl. Math. Comput. Intell., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 113–120, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.58915/amci.v13i2.555.
[2]N. Tariq et al., “Ground Truth from Multiple Manually Marked Images to Evaluate Blood Vessel Segmentation,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Robotics, Vision, Signal Processing and Power Applications, 2024, pp. 531–536. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-9005-4_67.
[3]M. C. S. Tang and H. Y. Ting, “Evaluating the Performance of ResNet Variant Models for Car Model Detection Using a Transfer Learning Approach,” in SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, 2024, pp. 125–132. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-68751-8_15.
[4]M. C. S. Tang and N. H. Rashidi, “Enhanced Brain Tumor Classification using Modified ResNet50 Architecture,” Borneo J. Sci. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–18, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.35370/bjost.2024.6.1-02.
[5]A. Sorayaie Azar, A. Naemi, S. Babaei Rikan, J. Bagherzadeh Mohasefi, H. Pirnejad, and U. K. Wiil, “Monkeypox detection using deep neural networks,” BMC Infect. Dis., vol. 23, no. 1, p. 438, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08408-4.
[6]A. I. Saleh and A. H. Rabie, “Human monkeypox diagnose (HMD) strategy based on data mining and artificial intelligence techniques,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 152, p. 106383, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106383.
[7]L. H. Huong, N. H. Khang, L. N. Quynh, L. H. Thang, D. M. Canh, and H. P. Sang, “A Proposed Approach for Monkeypox Classification,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 643–651, 2023, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140871.
[8]R. K. Hapsari, E. Purwanti, W. Widyanto, R. Gunawan, F. Nurlaily, and A. H. Salim, “Optimization Based Random Forest Algorithm Modification for Detecting Monkeypox Disease,” in 2023 Sixth International Conference on Vocational Education and Electrical Engineering (ICVEE), IEEE, Oct. 2023, pp. 340–346. doi: 10.1109/ICVEE59738.2023.10348223.
[9]A. H. Alharbi et al., “Diagnosis of Monkeypox Disease Using Transfer Learning and Binary Advanced Dipper Throated Optimization Algorithm,” Biomimetics, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 313, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8030313.
[10]A. H. Rabie and A. I. Saleh, “Monkeypox diagnosis using ensemble classification,” Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 143, p. 102618, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102618.
[11]Monkeypox, “Monkeypox detection Computer Vision Project.” Accessed: Dec. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://universe.roboflow.com/monkeypox-hz6op/monkeypox-detection-zehpo