Parametric optimization of Liquid Flow Process by ANOVA Optimized DE, PSO & GA Algorithms

Full Text (PDF, 709KB), PP.14-24

Views: 0 Downloads: 0


Pijush Dutta 1,* Madhurima Majumder 3 Asok Kumar 2

1. Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Global Institute of Management & Technology Krishnagar, India, Nadia :741102

2. Vidyasagar University, Medinipur, West Bengal, India, Pin: 713305

3. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Mirmadan Mohanlal Government Polytechnic, Gobindapur, Plassey, West Bengal 741156

* Corresponding author.


Received: 2 Aug. 2021 / Revised: 27 Aug. 2021 / Accepted: 15 Sep. 2021 / Published: 8 Oct. 2021

Index Terms

Liquid Flow model, ANOVA, Particle swarm optimization, differential Evolution, Genetic Algorithm.


Control of liquid level & flow are the most interest domain in process control industry. Generally process parameter of the liquid flow system is varied frequently during the operation. So the selection of the level of process parameters i.e. input variables seems to be important for achieving the optimum flow rate. In the present work focus is given on the identification of the proper combination of the input parameters in liquid flow rate process. Flow sensor output, pipe diameter, liquid conductivity & viscosity have been taken as input parameter; flow rate obtained from test is taken as response parameter. Till now several researchers have been performed various optimization methods for optimized the parameters of the process plant. But still computational time & convergence speed of the applied optimization techniques for the modelling of the nonlinear process system is still an open challenge for the modern research. In this research we proposed three evolutionary algorithms are used to optimize the process parameters of the nonlinear model implemented by ANOVA to mitigate the unbalance, convergence speed and reduce the total computational time. Overall research performed into three stage, in first phase nonlinear equation ANOVA has been used for mathematical model for the process, In second stage three evolutionary algorithms: GA, PSO & DE are applied for parametric optimization of liquid flow process to maximize the response parameter & in last phase comparative study performed on simulated results based on confirmed test & validated our proposed methodology.

Cite This Paper

Pijush Dutta, Madhurima Majumder, Asok Kumar, " Parametric optimization of Liquid Flow Process by ANOVA Optimized DE, PSO & GA Algorithms ", International Journal of Engineering and Manufacturing (IJEM), Vol.11, No.5, pp. 14-24, 2021. DOI: 10.5815/ijem.2021.05.02


[1]Dutta P, Kumar A. A Study on Performance of Different Open Loop PID Tunning Technique for a Liquid Flow Process. IJITCA 2016;6:13–22.

[2]Zhang Y, Xu X. Predicting the thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids using computational intelligence. Physics Letters A 2020;384:126500.

[3]Soares N, Pestana de Aguiar E, Goliatt L. Failure Classification in Electric Switch Machines Using Symbolic Concepts and Computational Intelligence. 2017.

[4]Fallah SN, Deo RC, Shojafar M, Conti M, Shamshirband S. Computational Intelligence Approaches for Energy Load Forecasting in Smart Energy Management Grids: State of the Art, Future Challenges, and Research Directions. Energies 2018;11:596.


[6]Dutta P, Kumar A. Effect of Different Defuzzification methods in a Fuzzy Based Liquid Flow control in Semiconductor Based Anemometer. IJITCA 2017;7:01–8.

[7]Dutta P, Biswas SK, Biswas S, Majumder M. Parametric optimization of Solar Parabolic Collector using metaheuristic Optimization. Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning 2021;2:7.

[8]DUTTA P, KUMAR A. Flow sensor analogue: realtime prediction analysis using SVM & KNN, 2018.

[9]Santhosh K, Roy BK. An Intelligent Flow Measurement Technique using Ultrasonic Flow Meter with Optimized Neural Network. 2012:5:4.

[10]Dutta P, Kumar A. Intelligent calibration technique using optimized fuzzy logic controller for ultrasonic flow sensor. MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF ENGINEERING PROBLEMS 2017;4:91–4.

[11]Roy BK, Venkata SK. A Practically Validated Intelligent Calibration Circuit Using Optimized ANN for Flow Measurement by Venturi | SpringerLink. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series B 2015:31–9.

[12]DUTTA P, KUMAR A. Study of optimized NN model for liquid flow sensor based on different parameters. Proceeding of international conference on materials, applied physics and engineering, 2018.

[13]Dutta P, Kumar A. Design an intelligent flow measurement technique by optimized fuzzy logic controller. Journal Européen Des Systèmes Automatisés  2018: 51:13: 89-107.

[14]DUTTA P, KUMAR A. Modelling of Liquid Flow control system Using Optimized Genetic Algorithm. Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing 2020;8:565–82.

[15]DUTTA P, KUMAR A. Design an intelligent calibration technique using optimized GA-ANN for liquid flow control system. Journal Europeen Des Systemes Automatises 2017;50:449–70.

[16]Dutta P, Kumar A. Application of an ANFIS model to Optimize the Liquid Flow Rate of a Process Control System. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2018;71:991–6.

[17]DUTTA P, KUMAR A. Modeling and Optimization of a Liquid Flow Process using an Artificial Neural Network-Based Flower Pollination Algorithm. Journal of Intelligent Systems 2018;29:787–98.

[18]Mandal S, DUTTA P, KUMAR A. Modeling of liquid flow control process using improved versions of elephant swarm water search algorithm. SN Applied Sciences 2019: 1: 8:1-16.

[19]Dutta P, Majumder M, Kumar A. An Improved Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Liquid flow Control System. I J Engineering and Manufacturing 2021;4:10–21.

[20]DUTTA P, Cengiz K, KUMAR A. Study of Bio- inspired neural networks for the Prediction of liquid flow in Process control system. Cognitive Big Data Intelligence with a Meta-Heuristic Approach, Elsevier; 2021.

[21]Dutta P, Mandal S, Kumar A. Application of FPA and ANOVA in the optimization of liquid flow control process. RCES 2019;5:7–11.

[22]DUTTA P, Mandal S, KUMAR A. Comparative study: FPA based response surface methodology ANOVA for the parameter optimization in process control. Advances in Modelling and Analysis C 2018;73:23–7.


[24]Liang J, Xu W, Yue C, Yu K, Song H, Crisalle OD, et al. Multimodal multiobjective optimization with differential evolution. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 2019;44:1028–59.

[25]Storn R, Ag S, Sn Z, Ring O, Price K. Minimizing the real functions of the ICEC’96 contest by Differential Evolution. IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC’96) 1996.

[26]Sun G, Li C, Deng L. An adaptive regeneration framework based on search space adjustment for differential evolution. Neural Computing and Applications 2021:1–17.

[27]Li S, Gu Q, Gong W, Ning B. An enhanced adaptive differential evolution algorithm for parameter extraction of photovoltaic models. Energy Conversion and Management 2020;205:112443.

[28]Bansal JC. Particle swarm optimization. Evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms, Springer; 2019, p. 11–23.

[29]Chopard B, Tomassini M. Particle swarm optimization. An Introduction to Metaheuristics for Optimization, Springer; 2018, p. 97–102.

[30]Khaled U, Eltamaly AM, Beroual A. Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization of renewable hybrid distributed generation. Energies 2017;10:1013.

[31]Elsheikh AH, Abd Elaziz M. Review on applications of particle swarm optimization in solar energy systems. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2019;16:1159–70.

[32]Khayati GR. A predictive model on size of silver nanoparticles prepared by green synthesis method using hybrid artificial neural network-particle swarm optimization algorithm. Measurement 2020;151:107199.

[33]Nunes HGG, Pombo JAN, Mariano S, Calado MRA, De Souza JF. A new high performance method for determining the parameters of PV cells and modules based on guaranteed convergence particle swarm optimization. Applied Energy 2018;211:774–91.

[34]Wang H, Peng M, Hines JW, Zheng G, Liu Y, Upadhyaya BR. A hybrid fault diagnosis methodology with support vector machine and improved particle swarm optimization for nuclear power plants. ISA Transactions 2019;95:358–71.

[35]Mirjalili S. Genetic algorithm. Evolutionary algorithms and neural networks, Springer; 2019, p. 43–55.

[36]Lambora A, Gupta K, Chopra K. Genetic algorithm-A literature review. 2019 International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COMITCon), IEEE; 2019, p. 380–4.

[37]Metawa N, Hassan MK, Elhoseny M. Genetic algorithm based model for optimizing bank lending decisions. Expert Systems with Applications 2017; 80:75–82.

[38]Kor O, Acarer S. Aerodynamic Optimization of a Compressor Rotor Using Genetic Algorithm. Designing Engineering Structures Using Stochastic Optimization Methods, CRC Press; 2020, p. 187–202.

[39]Sharma R, Jha BK, Pahuja V. Optimization Techniques for Response Predication in Metal Cutting Operation: A Review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial and Manufacturing Systems (CIMS-2020), Springer; 2022, p. 77–92.

[40]Zou S, Lu J, Mallik A, Khaligh A. Modeling and optimization of an integrated transformer for electric vehicle on-board charger applications. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification 2018; 4:355–63.

[41]Zhang Y, Zhou Y. Distributed coordination control of traffic network flow using adaptive genetic algorithm based on cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 2018; 119:110–20.

[42]Tran HK, Nguyen TN. Flight motion controller design using genetic algorithm for a quadcopter. Measurement and Control 2018; 51:59–64.