International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS)
IJMECS Vol. 18, No. 5, 8 Oct. 2026
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 626KB)
Reflective Culture and Digital Competence in Pre-Service Teacher Development: The Mediating Role of Instructional Smart Self-Efficacy
PDF (626KB), PP.104-117
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Aziz Shamitdinov
1
Ardak Rysbayeva
2
Lyudmila Demchenko
3
Aliya Kuralbayeva
1,*
Index Terms
Reflective Culture, Digital Competence, Pre-Service Teacher Development, Instructional Smart Self-Efficacy, Longitudinal Quasi-Experiment, Structural Equation Modeling.
Abstract
Teacher education requires models that connect reflective practice and digital competence with the psychological processes through which professional growth occurs. This longitudinal pre-test/post-test quasi-experiment examined whether a composite reflective-digital practice process predicted professional development and whether instructional smart self-efficacy mediated this association. The sample comprised 120 third-year pre-service teachers enrolled in a Computer Science Pedagogy program (N = 120) who completed a 15-week intervention organized across four instructional conditions. Data were collected with an expert-reviewed 19-item questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were used to assess the measurement and structural models, and indirect effects were evaluated with 5,000 bias-corrected bootstrap resamples. Internal consistency was satisfactory across the four constructs (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86-0.91). Reflective-digital practice was positively associated with professional outcomes (beta = 0.41, p < 0.001), whereas its path to instructional smart self-efficacy (beta = 0.12, p = 0.184) and the direct path from self-efficacy to professional outcomes (beta = 0.10, p = 0.211) were not significant. The bootstrapped indirect estimate was significant (B = 0.09, 95% CI [0.02, 0.17], p = 0.018), and the model explained 54% of the variance in professional outcomes (R² = 0.54). These findings provide preliminary empirical support for a mediated reflective-digital pathway, while the single-program sample and reliance on self-reports limit causal and population-level inference.
Cite This Paper
Aziz Shamitdinov, Ardak Rysbayeva, Lyudmila Demchenko, Aliya Kuralbayeva, "Reflective Culture and Digital Competence in Pre-Service Teacher Development: The Mediating Role of Instructional Smart Self-Efficacy", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.18, No.5, pp. 104-117, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2026.05.06
Reference
[1]Reisoğlu, İ. (2022). How does digital competence training affect teachers' professional development and activities? Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(3), 721-748.
[2]McGarr, O. (2024). Exploring and reflecting on the influences that shape teacher professional digital competence frameworks. Teachers and Teaching, 30(4), 509-525.
[3]Almås, A. G., Bueie, A. A., & Aagaard, T. (2021). From digital competence to professional digital competence: Student teachers’ experiences of and reflections on how teacher education prepares them for working life. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 70-85.
[4]Xu, C., Hania, A., & Waqas, M. (2025). Guiding the digital generation: role of principals’ leadership, ICT competence, and teacher professional competence in fostering digital citizenship among university students. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1165-1189.
[5]ElSayary, A. (2023). The impact of a professional upskilling training programme on developing teachers' digital competence. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(4), 1154-1166.
[6]Singun, A. J. (2025). Unveiling the barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. Discover Education, 4(1), 37.
[7]Sparrow, J. (2016). Reflective practice in organizational learning, cultural self‐understanding, and community self‐strengthening. Infant Mental Health Journal, 37(6), 605-616.
[8]Lindberg, O. J., Olofsson, A. D., Fransson, G., & Hansson, A. (2017). Developing awareness of digital competence and skills through dialogue–a methodological reflection. In INTED2017 Proceedings (pp. 5679-5686). IATED.
[9]Røe, Y., Johansen, T. S., & Bruset, E. B. (2025, February). Empowering digital competence through peer-assisted learning and virtual reality in health professions education. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1550396). Frontiers Media SA.
[10]Pan, F., Zhao, L., & Cao, E. Y. (2025). Revisiting factors influencing strategies for enhancing pre-service teachers’ digital competencies. Education and Information Technologies, 30(11), 15361-15397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13416-9
[11]Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
[12]Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
[13]Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
[14]Korthagen, F. A. J. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
[15]Chiu, T. K., Falloon, G., Song, Y., Wong, V. W., Zhao, L., & Ismailov, M. (2024). A self-determination theory approach to teacher digital competence development. Computers & Education, 214, 105017.
[16]Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., ... & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695-6726.
[17]Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 967-983.
[18]Stutchbury, K., Ebubedike, M., Amos, S., & Chamberlain, L. (2025). Professional development in the digital age: supporting improvements in teacher education through MOOCs. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 40(1), 67-90.
[19]Haşlaman, T., Uslu, N. A., & Mumcu, F. (2024). Development and in-depth investigation of pre-service teachers' digital competencies based on DigCompEdu: a case study. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 961-986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01674-z
[20]Inamorato dos Santos, A., Chinkes, E., Carvalho, M. A., Solórzano, C. M., & Marroni, L. S. (2023). The digital competence of academics in higher education: is the glass half empty or half full? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 9.
[21]Erümit, A. K., & Çetin, İ. (2020). Design framework of adaptive intelligent tutoring systems. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4477-4500.
[22]Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L. A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 8.
[23]Soriano-Alcantara, J. M., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2025). Exploring the educational digital landscape in the Dominican Republic: a comparative study of competencies in different stages and socio-digital environments. Journal of Computers in Education, 12(3), 829-851.
[24]Garzón-Artacho, E., Sola-Martínez, T., Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., & Gómez-García, G. (2021). Teachers' perceptions of digital competence at the lifelong learning stage. Heliyon, 7(7).
[25]Pan, X. (2020). Technology acceptance, technological self-efficacy, and attitude toward technology-based self-directed learning: Learning motivation as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 564294.
[26]Yoon, S. H. (2022). Gender and digital competence: Analysis of pre-service teachers’ educational needs and its implications. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 101989.
[27]Zhu, R., Alias, B. S., Hamzah, M. I. M., & Hamid, M. R. A. (2024). A threefold examination of university digital leadership, teacher digital competency, and teacher technology behavior for digital transformation of education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(10), 272-289.
[28]Ma, H., & Ismail, L. (2025). Bibliometric analysis and systematic review of digital competence in education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 185. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04401-1
[29]Tondeur, J., Howard, S. K., & Yang, J. (2021). One-size does not fit all: Towards an adaptive model to develop preservice teachers’ digital competencies. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106659.
[30]Li, H., & Tinmaz, H. (2025). Knowledge mapping of research on teachers’ digital competence in China: a bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace. Journal of Computers in Education, 12(1), 315-338.
[31]Tondeur, J., Howard, S., Van Zanten, M., Gorissen, P., Van der Neut, I., Uerz, D., & Kral, M. (2023). The HeDiCom framework: Higher Education teachers’ digital competencies for the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 33-53.
[32]Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266.
[33]Stevens, C. (2025). Teachers and teaching: pedagogy, digital skills and professional development. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 40(1), 1-3.
[34]Arcinas, M. M., Meenakshi, M., Bahalkar, P. S., Bhaturkar, D., Lalar, S., Rane, K. P., ... & Raghuvanshi, A. (2025). An efficient course recommendation system for higher education students using machine learning techniques. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 14(2), 1468-1475.
[35]Leoste, J., Lavicza, Z., Fenyvesi, K., Tuul, M., & Õun, T. (2022, May). Enhancing digital skills of early childhood teachers through online science, technology, engineering, art, math training programs in Estonia. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 894142). Frontiers Media SA.
[36]Brandão, A., Pedro, L., & Zagalo, N. (2024). Teacher Professional Development for a Future with Generative Artificial Intelligence: An Integrative Literature Review. Digital Education Review, 45, 151-157.
[37]Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137-161.
[38]Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press.
[39]Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
[40]Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[41]Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[42]Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02