AI-Based Temporal-Causal Modeling of Educational Curiosity through Novelty and Uncertainty Dynamics

PDF (1237KB), PP.122-140

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Billel Arbaoui 1,*

1. Department of Information and Communication Technology, Rangsit University, Pathumthani, Thailand

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2026.04.08

Received: 27 Oct. 2025 / Revised: 22 Dec. 2025 / Accepted: 9 Feb. 2026 / Published: 8 Aug. 2026

Index Terms

Adaptive Learning Systems, Affective Computing, AI in Education, Computational Modeling, Curiosity-Driven Learning, Temporal-Causal Modeling

Abstract

Curiosity is a foundational driver of learning, exploration, and lifelong intellectual growth. This study presents an AI-based temporal–causal model of educational curiosity that integrates psychological mechanisms with computational dynamics to explain how curiosity evolves within learning environments. The model formalizes the interactions among key factors—novelty, uncertainty, motivation, engagement, and autonomy—capturing their collective influence on learners’ adaptive behavior over time. A series of simulated learning scenarios, varying in novelty and uncertainty levels, demonstrate how contextual and personal conditions—including teacher–student relationships, socio-economic status, and environmental support—shape the temporal progression of curiosity. Mathematical and logical analyses confirm system stability, showing convergence of long-term novelty and uncertainty toward equilibrium and validating causal coherence through Temporal Trace Logic (TTL). The results reveal that curiosity thrives under moderate novelty and manageable uncertainty, reflecting adaptive equilibrium between cognitive tension and motivation. Findings provide a theoretical and computational foundation for AI-driven educational systems that dynamically sustain curiosity and engagement, contributing to inclusive and lifelong learning aligned with UN SDG 4.

Cite This Paper

Billel Arbaoui, "AI-Based Temporal-Causal Modeling of Educational Curiosity through Novelty and Uncertainty Dynamics", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.18, No.4, pp. 122-140, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2026.04.08

Reference

[1]D. E. Berlyne, Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. Martino Fine Books, 2014.
[2]G. Loewenstein, “The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation.,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 75–98, Jul. 1994, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75.
[3]J. Förster, J. Marguc, and M. Gillebaart, “Novelty Categorization Theory,” Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 736–755, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00289.x.
[4]C. Kidd and B. Y. Hayden, “The Psychology and Neuroscience of Curiosity,” Neuron, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 449–460, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.010.
[5]T. B. Kashdan, P. Rose, and F. D. Fincham, “Curiosity and Exploration: Facilitating Positive Subjective Experiences and Personal Growth Opportunities,” J. Pers. Assess., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 291–305, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05.
[6]T. B. Kashdan et al., “The curiosity and exploration inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics,” J. Res. Pers., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 987–998, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.011.
[7]J. Pearl, Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, 2nd ed. USA: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[8]K. P. Murphy and S. J. Russell, “Dynamic bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning,” 2002. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:919497
[9]B. P. Woolf, Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2008.
[10]UNESCO / United Nations, “Transforming Education Towards SDG 4 Report of a global survey on country actions to transform education.” 2024.
[11]Y. Shao, S. Kang, Q. Lu, C. Zhang, and R. Li, “How peer relationships affect academic achievement among junior high school students: The chain mediating roles of learning motivation and learning engagement,” BMC Psychol., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 278, May 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01780-z.
[12]H. Akram and S. Li, “Understanding the Role of Teacher-Student Relationships in Students’ Online Learning Engagement: Mediating Role of Academic Motivation,” Percept. Mot. Skills, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 1415–1438, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1177/00315125241248709.
[13]Y. Wang, L. Wang, L. Yang, and W. Wang, “Influence of perceived social support and academic self-efficacy on teacher-student relationships and learning engagement for enhanced didactical outcomes,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 28396, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78402-6.
[14]A. Bandura, Self-efficacy:  The exercise of control. New York,  NY,  US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co, 1997.
[15]W. Guo, J. Wang, N. Li, and L. Wang, “The impact of teacher emotional support on learning engagement among college students mediated by academic self-efficacy and academic resilience,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 3670, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88187-x.
[16]D. Michael and L. Kyriakides, “Mediating effects of motivation and socioeconomic status on reading achievement: a secondary analysis of PISA 2018,” Large-scale Assessments Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 31, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40536-023-00181-9.
[17]R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, p. 101860, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
[18]S. Wade and C. Kidd, “The role of prior knowledge and curiosity in learning,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1377–1387, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01598-6.
[19]B. Arbaoui and S. Jantavongso, “Enhancing deep learning for workplace self-confidence: integrating the all-or-none law in neural networks,” Int. J. Inf. Technol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 615–627, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s41870-024-02298-8.
[20]J. Treur, “On the dynamics and adaptivity of mental processes: Relating adaptive dynamical systems and self-modeling network models by mathematical analysis,” Cogn. Syst. Res., vol. 70, pp. 93–100, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.07.003.
[21]G. Canbaloğlu, J. Treur, and A. Wiewiora, Eds., Computational Modeling of Multilevel Organisational Learning and Its Control Using Self-modeling Network Models, vol. 468. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-28735-0.
[22]R. F. Port and T. van Gelder, Eds., Mind as Motion. The MIT Press, 1998. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/4622.001.0001.
[23]H. Yuttachai, B. Arbaoui, and Y. O-manee, “Indirect feedback alignment in deep learning for cognitive agent modeling: enhancing self-confidence analytics in the workplace,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 14, no. 6, p. 6699, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v14i6.pp6699-6710.
[24]H. Yuttachai, B. Arbaoui, and Y. O-manee, “Agent-Based Model for Situational Awareness in the Workplace: Enhancing Neural Networks with Direct Feedback Alignment,” TEM J., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1786–1792, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.18421/TEM133-07.
[25]L. van Ments and J. Treur, “Dynamics, Adaptation and Control for Mental Models: A Cognitive Architecture,” in Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 394, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2022, pp. 3–26. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85821-6_1.
[26]B. Arbaoui, “A computational approach to cognitive architecture with adaptive networks and entropy-driven dynamics,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 18, p. 100692, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2026.100692.
[27]Y. O-manee, N. S. A. Ismail, and B. Arbaoui, “Advancing temporal-causal modeling for public sector adaptation: an AI-driven approach to organizational strategy and governance,” Int. J. Inf. Technol., Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s41870-025-02591-0.
[28]B. Arbaoui, Y. O-manee, Y. Hareebin, H. Hayeewachi, and P. Thonghom, “Self-confidence at Workplace: Cognitive Agent Modeling and Analysis,” Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 21–34, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.22266/ijies2022.1231.03.
[29]B. Arbaoui, Y. O-manee, P. Yuso, and Y. Hareebin, “An Agent-Based Model for Situational Awareness at Workplace,” Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 35–46, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.22266/ijies2022.1031.04.
[30]B. Arbaoui and H. Surbakti, “A generative neural network for psychological traits in workplace self-confidence: a physics-inspired approach,” Int. J. Inf. Technol., May 2025, doi: 10.1007/s41870-025-02565-2.
[31]B. Arbaoui, “Quantum-inspired modeling of workplace self-confidence: a hybrid approach integrating myelin plasticity and adaptive learning,” Int. J. Inf. Technol., Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s41870-025-02643-5.
[32]V. Emslander, D. Holzberger, S. B. Ofstad, A. Fischbach, and R. Scherer, “Teacher–student relationships and student outcomes: A systematic second-order meta-analytic review.,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 365–397, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1037/bul0000461.
[33]J. Cornelius-White, “Learner-Centered Teacher-Student Relationships Are Effective: A Meta-Analysis,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 113–143, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.3102/003465430298563.
[34]A. M. Ryan, “The Peer Group as a Context for the Development of Young Adolescent Motivation and Achievement,” Child Dev., vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 1135–1150, Jul. 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00338.
[35]P. A. Jennings and M. T. Greenberg, “The Prosocial Classroom: Teacher Social and Emotional Competence in Relation to Student and Classroom Outcomes,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 491–525, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.3102/0034654308325693.
[36]C. Mitchell and L. Sackney, Profound Improvement: Building Capacity for a Learning Community. Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.th/books?id=KssG0zcXPOAC
[37]M. Zee and H. M. Y. Koomen, “Teacher Self-Efficacy and Its Effects on Classroom Processes, Student Academic Adjustment, and Teacher Well-Being,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 981–1015, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.3102/0034654315626801.
[38]P. Barrett, F. Davies, Y. Zhang, and L. Barrett, “The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis,” Build. Environ., vol. 89, pp. 118–133, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013.
[39]G. I. Earthman, “Prioritization of 31 Criteria for School Building Adequacy,” 2004. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:11034029
[40]K. Talsma, B. Schüz, R. Schwarzer, and K. Norris, “I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 61, pp. 136–150, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015.
[41]D. H. Schunk, “Self-Efficacy and Education and Instruction,” 1995, pp. 281–303. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_10.
[42]T. A. Judge and J. E. Bono, “Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis.,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 80–92, 2001, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80.
[43]B. J. Zimmerman, “Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 82–91, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.
[44]F. Pajares, “Gender and Perceived Self-Efficacy in Self-Regulated Learning,” Theory Pract., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 116–125, May 2002, doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_8.
[45]E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1985. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7.
[46]R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.,” Am. Psychol., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2000, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
[47]M. Csikszentmihalyi, Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8.
[48]M. Komarraju, S. J. Karau, R. R. Schmeck, and A. Avdic, “The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 472–477, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.019.
[49]I. Siraj‐Blatchford, “Learning in the home and at school: How working class children ‘succeed against the odds,’” Br. Educ. Res. J., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 463–482, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1080/01411920902989201.
[50]J. Reeve, “Teachers as Facilitators: What Autonomy‐Supportive Teachers Do and Why Their Students Benefit,” Elem. Sch. J., vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 225–236, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1086/501484.
[51]A. Kirkwood and L. Price, “Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review,” Learn. Media Technol., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 6–36, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.770404.
[52]E. L. Deci, R. M. Ryan, and G. C. Williams, “Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 165–183, 1996, doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90013-8.
[53]J. A. Fredricks, P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris, “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 59–109, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059.
[54]K. Salmela-Aro and K. Upadyaya, “School engagement and school burnout profiles during high school – The role of socio-emotional skills,” Eur. J. Dev. Psychol., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 943–964, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/17405629.2020.1785860.
[55]S. Engel, “Children’s Need to Know: Curiosity in Schools,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 625–645, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.17763/haer.81.4.h054131316473115.
[56]K. Murayama, L. FitzGibbon, and M. Sakaki, “Process Account of Curiosity and Interest: A Reward-Learning Perspective,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 875–895, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09499-9.
[57]P.-Y. Oudeyer, J. Gottlieb, and M. Lopes, “Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning,” 2016, pp. 257–284. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.05.005.
[58]M. J. Kang et al., “The Wick in the Candle of Learning,” Psychol. Sci., vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 963–973, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x.
[59]D. E. Berlyne, Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1960. doi: 10.1037/11164-000.
[60]F. Poli, J. X. O’Reilly, R. B. Mars, and S. Hunnius, “Curiosity and the dynamics of optimal exploration,” Trends Cogn. Sci., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 441–453, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.001.
[61]P.-Y. Oudeyer, “Computational Theories of Curiosity-Driven Learning.” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.10546
[62]OECD, “OECD Learning Compass 2030: Curiosity and Motivation for Future-Ready Learners.” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2024.
[63]A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
[64]D. H. Schunk and M. K. DiBenedetto, “Motivation and social cognitive theory,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 60, p. 101832, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832.
[65]M. J. Gruber and C. Ranganath, “How Curiosity Enhances Hippocampus-Dependent Memory: The Prediction, Appraisal, Curiosity, and Exploration (PACE) Framework,” Trends Cogn. Sci., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1014–1025, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.003.