G. M. Kiran; A. Aparna Rajesh; D. Basavesha

DS-RAE: Advance Hybrid Double Residual Self-Attention and Recursive Autoencoder Approach for Dynamic Cloud Workload Forecasting

PDF (702KB), PP.42-61

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

G. M. Kiran ^1,* A. Aparna Rajesh ² D. Basavesha ¹

1. Shridevi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Karnataka 572106 India

2. Aryan institute of engineering and technology, Odisha 752050 India

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijigsp.2025.05.04

Received: 8 Feb. 2024 / Revised: 14 May 2024 / Accepted: 12 May 2025 / Published: 8 Oct. 2025

Index Terms

Resource Management, CPU, Memory Utilization, Z-Score Normalization Dynamization of Sliding Window, Hybrid DS-RAE Model

Abstract

Infrastructure as a service is used for resource management. Resources that will be available on demand are effectively managed using the resource management module. Predicting CPU and memory usage assists with resource management when cloud resources are provided. This study uses a hybrid DS-RAE model to forecast CPU and memory utilization in the future. Predictions are made using the range of values found, which is helpful for resource management. The memory and CPU use patterns in the cloud traces are identified by the Double Channel Residual Self-Attention Temporal Convolution Network (DSTNW) model as having linear components. The Recursive Autoencoder (RAE) model for tracing and enlarging nonlinear components and power consumption was developed using the DSTNW model. Gathers the raw data taken from the system's operational state, such as bandwidth, disk I/O time, disk space, CPU, and memory utilization. Discover patterns and oscillations in the workload trace by preprocessing the data to increase the prediction efficacy of this model. During data pre-processing, missing value edge computing and z-score normalization are used to select the important properties from raw data samples, eliminate irrelevant elements, and normalize them. After that, preprocessing utilizes a dynamization of the sliding window to improve the proposed model's accuracy on non-random workloads. Next, utilize a hybrid DS-RAE to attain accurate workload forecasting. Comparing the suggested methodology with existing models, experimental results show that it offers a better trade-off between training time and accuracy. The suggested method provides higher performance, with an execution time of 32 seconds and an accuracy rate of 97%. According to the simulation results, the DS-RAE workload prediction method performs better than other algorithms.

Cite This Paper

G. M. Kiran, A. Aparna Rajesh, D. Basavesha, "DS-RAE: Advance Hybrid Double Residual Self-Attention and Recursive Autoencoder Approach for Dynamic Cloud Workload Forecasting ", International Journal of Image, Graphics and Signal Processing(IJIGSP), Vol.17, No.5, pp. 42-61, 2025. DOI:10.5815/ijigsp.2025.05.04

Reference

[1]A. Belgacem, S. Mahmoudi, and M. A. Ferrag, “A machine learning model for improving virtual machine migration in cloud computing,” The Journal of Supercomputing, pp. 1-23, 2023.
[2]K. M. Hassan, F. E. Z. A. El-Gamal, and M. Elmogy, “Intelligent Mechanism for Virtual Machine Migration in Cloud Computing,” In World Conference on Internet of Things: Applications & Future (pp. 67-83), 2023. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[3]S. Karthick, “Semi Supervised Hierarchy Forest Clustering and KNN Based Metric Learning Technique for Machine Learning System,” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, vol. 9, pp. 2679-2690, 2017.
[4]J. A. Barron-Lugo, J. L., Gonzalez-Compean, I. Lopez-Arevalo, J. Carretero, and J. L. Martinez-Rodriguez, “Xel: A cloud-agnostic data platform for the design-driven building of high-availability data science services,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 145, pp. 87-103, 2023
[5]D. Huang, L. Costero, A. Pahlevan, M. Zapater, and D. Atienza, “CloudProphet: A Machine Learning-Based Performance Prediction for Public Clouds,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16333 (2023)
[6]K. L. Devi, and S. Valli, “Time series-based workload prediction using the statistical hybrid model for the cloud environment,” Computing, vol. 105(2), pp. 353-374, 2023
[7]B. M. Hardas, S. Kaushik, A. Goyal, Y. Dongare, M. G. Aush, and S. Chiwhane, “Deep Learning with Multi-Headed Attention for Forecasting Residential Energy Consumption,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, vol. 12(2s), pp. 109-119, 2024
[8]S. Khurana, G. Sharma, and B. Sharma, “A fine tune hyper parameter Gradient Boosting model for CPU utilization prediction in cloud,” 2023.
[9]D. Saxena, J. Kumar, A. K. Singh, and S. Schmid, “Performance analysis of machine learning centered workload prediction models for cloud,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 34(4), pp. 1313-1330, 2023
[10]B. Gort, M. Serrano, and A. Antonopoulos, “Forecasting Trends in Cloud/Edge Computing: Unleashing the Power of Attention Mechanisms,” Authorea Preprints, 2023
[11]M. Xu, C. Song, H. Wu, S. S. Gill, K. Ye, and C. Xu, “esDNN: deep neural network based multivariate workload prediction in cloud computing environments,” ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), vol. 22(3), pp. 1-24, 2022
[12]S. Zhou, J. Li, K. Zhang, M. Wen, and Q. Guan, “An accurate ensemble forecasting approach for highly dynamic cloud workload with vmd and r-transformer,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 115992-116003,2020
[13]Z. Ahamed, M. Khemakhem, F. Eassa, F. Alsolami, and A. S. A. M. Al-Ghamdi, “Technical Study of Deep Learning in Cloud Computing for Accurate Workload Prediction,” Electronics, vol. 12(3), 650, 2023
[14]A. I. Maiyza, N. O. Korany, K. Banawan, H. A. Hassan, and W. M. Sheta, “VTGAN: hybrid generative adversarial networks for cloud workload prediction,” Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 12(1), pp. 97, 2023
[15]J. Dogani, F. Khunjush, and M. Seydali, “Host load prediction in cloud computing with Discrete Wavelet Transformation (DWT) and Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (BiGRU) network,” Computer Communications, vol. 198, pp. 157-174, 2023
[16]D. Alqahtani, “Leveraging sparse auto-encoding and dynamic learning rate for efficient cloud workloads prediction,” IEEE Access, 2023
[17]S. Huang, Z. Wang, H. Zhang, X. Wang, C. Zhang, and W. Wang, “One for All: Unified Workload Prediction for Dynamic Multi-tenant Edge Cloud Platforms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01507, 2023.
[18]Y. S. Patel, and J. Bedi, “MAG-D: A multivariate attention network based approach for cloud workload forecasting,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 142, pp. 376-392, 2023
[19]H. L. Leka, Z. Fengli, A. T. Kenea, N. W. Hundera, T. G. Tohye, and A. T. Tegene, “PSO-Based Ensemble Meta-Learning Approach for Cloud Virtual Machine Resource Usage Prediction,” Symmetry, vol. 15(3), pp. 613, 2023
[20]M. ZargarAzad, and M. Ashtiani, “An auto-scaling approach for microservices in cloud computing environments, 2023.
[21]Dataset 1: http://github.com/beloglazov/planetlab-workload-traces%20
[22]J. Gao, H. Wang, and H. Shen, “Machine learning based workload prediction in cloud computing,” In 2020 29th international conference on computer communications and networks (ICCCN) (pp. 1-9), 2020. IEEE.
[23]D. Saxena, and A. K. Singh, “Auto-adaptive learning-based workload forecasting in dynamic cloud environment. International Journal of Computers and Applications, vol. 44(6), pp. 541-551, 2022

International Journal of Image, Graphics and Signal Processing (IJIGSP)