International Journal of Education and Management Engineering (IJEME)
IJEME Vol. 16, No. 3, 8 Jun. 2026
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 584KB)
Quantum Key Distribution-Enabled Federated Learning over Blockchain for Privacy-Preserving AI in Large-Scale IoT Networks
PDF (584KB), PP.94-104
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Index Terms
Quantum Key Distribution, Federated Learning, Blockchain, IoT Security, Privacy-Preserving AI, Post-Quantum Cryptography, Byzantine Fault Tolerance
Abstract
The proliferation of massive IoT networks has created an environment where distributed AI can be achieved. At the same time, it introduces serious privacy and security challenges. Federated learning (FL) allows training local models on IoT devices and aggregating them without sharing data, but still suffers from problems such as gradient inference attack, Byzantine model poisoning attack and the failure in single point of failure centralized aggregation point. In this paper, we propose QFL-BC, a framework combining Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and a permissioned blockchain to holistically tackle the problem. Using the BB84 protocol with decoy states, QKD generates a One-Time Pad key to encrypt the model update and achieve information-theoretic security with provable security against a quantum attacker. The central aggregator is replaced by the permissioned blockchain with a smart contract, which ensures an immutable audit trail and distributes the orchestration of FL training decent rally, as well as imposes a penalty on malicious participants by automatic reputation score maintenance. The experiments with MNIST and CIFAR-10 on 100 IoT clients under Non-IID conditions show QFL-BC obtains an accuracy of 96.8% against 41.5% for classic FL under 10% poisoning attack (133% relative improvement). We have tested its robustness across adversary percentages of 10%-40% with accuracy above 87.3% and measured scalability up to 500 clients, showing good degradation, communications overhead of 5.84 MB per round, which is only 12.3% higher than the classic FL and analysed latency and energy to evaluate its feasibility on resource-constrained IoT devices.
Cite This Paper
David Shiala Ongoma, "Quantum Key Distribution-Enabled Federated Learning over Blockchain for Privacy-Preserving AI in Large-Scale IoT Networks", International Journal of Education and Management Engineering (IJEME), Vol.16, No.3, pp. 94-104, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijeme.2026.03.07
Reference
[1]M. H. ur Rehman, K. Salah, E. Damiani, and D. Svetinovic, "Towards blockchain-based reputation-aware federated learning," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM Workshops, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2020, pp. 1-6. doi:10.1109/INFOCOMWKSHPS50562.2020.9162827
[2]Q. Yang, Y. Liu, T. Chen, and Y. Tong, "Federated machine learning: Concept and applications," ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1-19, Jan. 2019. doi:10.1145/3298981
[3]B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, "Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data," in Proc. Artif. Intell. Statist. (AISTATS), Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA, 2017, pp. 1273-1282.
[4]L. Lyu, H. Yu, and Q. Yang, "Threats to federated learning: A survey," arXiv:2003.02133, 2020.
[5]S. Pirbhulal, A. G. Abeshu, and N. Chilamkurti, "Blockchain and quantum cryptography for internet of things: A survey," IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2491-2508, Feb. 2022. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2021.3093177
[6]H.-K. Lo, M. Curty, and K. Tamaki, "Secure quantum key distribution," Nature Photon., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 595-604, Aug. 2014. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.149
[7]M. Abadi et al., "Deep learning with differential privacy," in Proc. ACM SIGSAC Conf. Comput. Commun. Secur. (CCS), Vienna, Austria, 2016, pp. 308-318. doi:10.1145/2976749.2978318
[8]C. Zhang, S. Li, J. Xia, W. Wang, and F. Yan, "BatchCrypt: Efficient homomorphic encryption for cross-silo federated learning," in Proc. USENIX ATC, 2020, pp. 493-506.
[9]H. Kim, J. Park, M. Bennis, and S.-L. Kim, "Blockchained on-device federated learning," IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1279-1283, Jun. 2020. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2019.2921755
[10]Y. Lu, X. Huang, Y. Dai, S. Maharjan, and Y. Zhang, "Blockchain and federated learning for privacy-preserved data sharing in industrial IoT," IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 4177-4186, Jun. 2020. doi:10.1109/TII.2019.2942190
[11]R. Kumar, M. A. U. Hassan, and A. K. Das, "Quantum key distribution for internet of things: A review," IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 14, pp. 12157-12178, Jul. 2023. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2023.3248765
[12]M. G. G. A. Khan, A. U. R. Khan, and M. A. Khan, "Quantum federated learning: A new paradigm for privacy preserving AI," IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1452-1465, Mar. 2024. doi:10.1109/TNSE.2023.3298471
[13]D. Boneh and V. Shoup, A Graduate Course in Applied Cryptography. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford Univ. Press, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://crypto.stanford.edu/~dabo/cryptobook/
[14]W. Stallings, Cryptography and Network Security: Principles and Practice, 8th ed. London, U.K.: Pearson, 2023.
[15]P. K. Sharma, S. Kumar, and J. H. Park, "Blockchain-based federated learning for intelligent IoT: A comprehensive survey," IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 669-697, 1st Quart. 2023. doi:10.1109/COMST.2022.3209945
[16]C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, "Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing," Theor. Comput. Sci., vol. 560, pp. 7-11, Dec. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025 (Republication of original 1984 paper)
[17]Y. Zhang, L. Chen, and R. Singh, "Post-quantum secure federated learning for industrial IoT: Lattice-based key encapsulation and hybrid QKD fallback," IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2315-2328, Mar. 2024. doi:10.1109/TII.2023.3312094
[18]J. Wang, X. Li, H. Liu, and M. Chen, "Energy-aware federated learning for battery-constrained IoT edge devices," IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 7823-7836, Mar. 2024. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2023.3285617
[19]T. Li, A. K. Sahu, M. Zaheer, M. Sanjabi, A. Smola, and V. Smith, "Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks," Proc. Mach. Learn. Syst. (MLSys), vol. 2, pp. 429-450, 2020. [Introduces FedProx and non-IID convergence analysis]
[20]R. Zhao, Y. Zhu, S. Feng, S. Zhu, Y. Qin, and J. Shao, "FedInv: Byzantine-robust federated learning by inversing local model updates," in Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 37, no. 9, 2023, pp. 11229-11237. doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i9.26326
[21]R. M. Amiri, D. Bhatt, T. Toth, and N. Lutkenhaus, "Efficient long-distance quantum key distribution for metropolitan IoT deployments," npj Quantum Inf., vol. 11, pp. 45, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41534-025-00921-x
[22]B. Maiyya, F. Nawab, D. Agrawal, and A. El Abbadi, "Unifying consensus and atomic commitment for effective cloud data management," Proc. VLDB Endow., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 611-623, Jan. 2019. [Analysis of HotStuff and Byzantine-tolerant consensus for distributed systems]