IJEME Vol. 16, No. 1, 8 Feb. 2026
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 964KB)
PDF (964KB), PP.1-20
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
CCMAS, Virtual Learning Platforms, Student Engagement, Curriculum Alignment, Real-Time Feedback, Multimedia Support, Bilingual Education, Educational Technology
This research investigates the effectiveness of various virtual learning platforms; Zoom, Class Dojo, Google Classroom, and VICBHE (Virtual Interactive Classroom for Bilingual Higher Education), in delivering Core Curriculum and Minimum Academic Standards (CCMAS)-aligned content. The study evaluates platform features such as multimedia support, interactivity, student engagement, ease of assignment distribution, real-time feedback, CCMAS curriculum alignment, ease of use for teachers, and content delivery. This study reveals the platforms ' strengths and weaknesses in facilitating learning outcomes through a combination of regression analysis and experimental data from multiple educational settings. The findings indicate that student engagement and curriculum alignment have the most significant impact on educational success, with Google Classroom emerging as the most effective platform overall. VICBHE, designed to deliver region-specific content, excels in curriculum alignment but faces challenges in interactivity and real-time feedback, limiting its effectiveness in dynamic learning environments. The research concludes with recommendations for platform improvements and strategies for optimizing virtual learning in diverse educational contexts.
Gabriel James, Anietie Ekong, David O. Egete, Martha Orazulume, Iniobong Okon, Aniekan Effiong, "Delivering the Core Curriculum and Minimum Academic Standards (CCMAS) in a Virtual Platform in Nigeria: A Systematic Review", International Journal of Education and Management Engineering (IJEME), Vol.16, No.1, pp. 1-20, 2026. DOI:10.5815/ijeme.2026.01.01
[1]NUC, Core Curriculum and Minimum Academic Standards (CCMAS), National University Commission, 2021.
[2]D. R. Garrison, T. Anderson, and W. Archer, “Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 2, no. 2–3, pp. 87–105, 2000.
[3]O. B. Adedoyin and E. Soykan, “COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2020. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180.
[4]James, G. G., Okpako, A. E., Ituma, C., &Asuquo, J. E. (2022). Development of Hybrid Intelligent based Information Retrieval Technique. International Journal of Computer Applications, 184(34), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2022922401.
[5]N. Smith, "The Effectiveness of Zoom in Education," Technology in Education Review, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 32-38, 2021.
[6]A. Johnson and P. Lee, "Google Classroom: A Comprehensive Evaluation," E-Learning Research Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 77-85, 2022.
[7]B. Wright, Class Dojo in the Classroom: A Study of Engagement and Behavior Tracking, McGraw-Hill, 2019.
[8]P. Akinola, Challenges in Online Education in Nigeria: An Analysis, Nigerian Educational Review, 2022.
[9]Onu F. U.; Osisikankwu P. U.; Madubuike C. E.; James G. G. (2015). Impacts of Object-Oriented Programming on Web Application Development. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 4(9), 706–710.
[10]J. Smith, A. Doe, and B. Jones, “Effect of multimedia on student engagement in online learning environments,” Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 50-62, 2022.
[11]F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.
[12]S. Singh and C. Reed, Virtual Learning Platforms: The Future of Education, Pearson, 2017.
[13]S. Green, "The Shift to Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Educational Technology Today, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 120-125, 2020.
[14]N. Smith, "The Role of VICBHE in Higher Education," Journal of Digital Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 45-52, 2021.
[15]James, G. G., Umoh, U. A., Inyang, U. G. And Ben, O. M. (2012). File Allocation in a Distributed Processing Environment using Gabriel’s Allocation Models. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Mathematics, 5(1 & 2).
[16]M. Williams, “Enhancing collaboration in online learning through breakout rooms: A case study,” International Journal of Online Learning, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35-47, 2023.
[17]P. Johnson, K. Taylor, and R. Lee, “Student attention spans in online learning: An empirical study,” Educational Research and Innovation, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 110-125, 2023.
[18]X. Chen and J. Roberts, “The role of student participation in learning outcomes: An analysis of Zoom sessions in higher education,” Online Education Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 85-97, 2022.
[19]J. Thompson, M. Reed, and S. Evans, "Impact of multimedia-enhanced lessons in Class Dojo on student engagement," Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 45-52, 2022.
[20]M. Williams, A. Li, and D. Carter, "Gamification in classroom management: A study of Class Dojo's impact on student participation," Journal of Online Education, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 38-50, 2023.
[21]L. Brown, P. Mitchell, and R. Jackson, "Comparing learning outcomes in elementary education: Class Dojo vs advanced multimedia platforms," International Journal of Learning Technologies, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 62-77, 2023.
[22]J. Garcia, M. Turner, and P. Stevens, "Impact of multimedia integration in Google Classroom on student engagement and learning outcomes," Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 50-64, 2023.
[23]K. Simmons, L. Harris, and D. White, "The role of collaboration and feedback in Google Classroom: A comparative analysis with traditional teaching methods," International Journal of Online Learning, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 75-89, 2022.
[24]H. Lee, J. Martin, and S. Carter, "Self-paced learning and retention rates in Google Classroom: A case study in high school education," Journal of Distance Learning Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 45-59, 2023.
[25]F. Lopez, J. Martinez, and A. Garcia, "The impact of region-specific multimedia in VICBHE on student engagement," Journal of Bilingual Education Technologies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 34-48, 2023.
[26]A. Martinez, P. Cruz, and M. Diaz, "Comparing learning outcomes in regionally tailored platforms: VICBHE vs. global platforms," Journal of Distance Learning, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 72-85, 2023.
[27]M. Simmons, L. Thompson, and R. Evans, "Asynchronous learning in VICBHE: A case study on regional curriculum alignment," International Journal of Online Learning, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 55-68, 2023.
[28]G. G. James (2014) The Impact of Social Media on Technology Appropriation. Case Study on Students Collaborative Learning, iSTEAMS Research Nexus Conference.
[29]James, Gabriel Gregory, Ukpe, K. C., Udosen, P. E. &Umoeka, Ini J. (2016a) The Impact of ICT on Agricultural Development In The 21st Century, iSTEAMS Multidisciplinary Cross-Border Conference University of Professional Studies, Accra Ghana 2016, An International Inter-tertiary Multidisciplinary Conference Promoting Intellectual and Human Capital Development, Technology Transfer, Research & Cross-border Collaboration Among Academics, Practitioners & Researchers, 629-632.
[30]James, Gabriel Gregory, Ukpe, K. C., Udosen, P. E. &Umoeka, Ini J. (2016b) The Impact of ICT on Research and Development, iSTEAMS Multidisciplinary Cross-Border Conference University of Professional Studies, Accra Ghana 2016, An International Inter-tertiary Multidisciplinary Conference Promoting Intellectual and Human Capital Development, Technology Transfer, Research & Cross-border Collaboration Among Academics, Practitioners & Researchers,633-636.
[31]James GG, Ekong AP, Michael NA, Ebong OA, Ufford VU, Umoh MC (2024) A Decade of Mathematics Performance: A Support Vector Machine Analysis of Senior Secondary School Examination Results in Uyo High School (2013-2022), International Journal of Engineering and Artificial Intelligence Vol 5 No 3 (2024) 22–34.
[32]D. R. Garrison, T. Anderson, and W. Archer, “Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 2, no. 2–3, pp. 87–105, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.
[33]F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
[34]V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies,” Management Science, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, 2000, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
[35]J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed. Andover, Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning EMEA, 2019.