INFORMATION CHANGE THE WORLD

International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications(IJISA)

ISSN: 2074-904X (Print), ISSN: 2074-9058 (Online)

Published By: MECS Press

IJISA Vol.5, No.2, Jan. 2013

A New Entropy Weight for Sub-Criteria in Interval Type-2 Fuzzy TOPSIS and Its Application

Full Text (PDF, 477KB), PP.25-33


Views:30   Downloads:2

Author(s)

Lazim Abdullah, Adawiyah Otheman

Index Terms

Fuzzy TOPSIS, Entropy Method, Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set, Supplier Selection

Abstract

Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarly to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is one of the most commonly used approaches in solving numerous multiple criteria decision making problems. It has been widely used in ranking of multiple alternatives with respect to multiple criteria with the superiority of fuzzy set type-1 and subjective weights. Recently, fuzzy TOPSIS has been merged with interval type-2 fuzzy sets and subjective weights for criteria as to handle the wide arrays of vagueness and uncertainty. However, the role of objective weights in this new interval type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS has given considerably less attention. This paper aims to propose a new objective weight for sub-criteria in interval type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS. Instead of using weight for criteria, this paper considers entropy weights for sub-criteria in interval type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS method. An example of supplier selection is used to illustrate the proposed method.

Cite This Paper

Lazim Abdullah, Adawiyah Otheman,"A New Entropy Weight for Sub-Criteria in Interval Type-2 Fuzzy TOPSIS and Its Application", IJISA, vol.5, no.2, pp.25-33, 2013.DOI: 10.5815/ijisa.2013.02.03

Reference

[1]Hwang C.L and K. Yoon, (1981). Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 

[2]Elissa, N.M and O.M.T. Abu, (2011). Fuzzy TOPSIS Method in the Selection of Investment Boards by Incorporating Operational Risks. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering London, 1, 1-5.

[3]Nieto, M.A. and V.F. Ruz, (2012). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for construction contractor prequalification. Automation in Construction, 25, 8–19.

[4]Wei, et al., (2011). A Contractor Prequalification Model based on Triangular Fuzzy Number and TOPSIS. The IEEE International Conference Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IE&E), 1,1-4. 

[5]Yong, D. (2006). Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. Int. J. Adv. Manuf Technol., 28, 839-844.

[6]Zadeh. L.A. (1975). The Concept of Linguistic Variables And Its Application To Approximate Reasoning-I. Inform.Science, 8, 199-249.

[7]Zadeh. L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Journal of Information and Control, 8, 338-353.

[8]Mendel, J. and Q. Liang, (2000). Equalization of nonlinear time-varying channels using type-2 fuzzy adaptive filters. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 8(5), 551–563.

[9]Zhang. Z. (2012). On Interval Type-2 Rough Fuzzy Sets. Knowl. Based System. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys. 2012.04.002. Accessed on 15 June 2012.

[10]Chen, S.M and L.W. Lee, (2010). Fuzzy Multiple Attributes Group Decision- Making Based on The Interval Type-2 TOPSIS Method. J. Expert Syst. Appl., 37. 2790-2798.

[11]Chena, S.M. et al., (2011). Fuzzy Multiple Attributes Group Decision- Making Based on The Ranking Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set. J. Expert System Application, 39, 5295-5308.

[12]Wang, T.C. and H.D. Lee, (2009). Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8980–8985.

[13]Zamri. N and L. Abdullah, (2012). A Weight of Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Rasch Model in Desicion Making Approach” Ranking Causes Lead Of Road Accident Occurrence. Int. J. Soft. Comp., 7, 1, 1-11.

[14]Shahanagi, K. and S.A. Yazdian, (2008). Vendor selection using a new fuzzy group TOPSIS approach. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 3(3), 221-231.

[15]Weber, C.A., J.R. Current, and W.C. Benton, (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50(1), 2-18.

[16]Mummalaneni, V., K.M. Dubas, and C. Chao, (1996). Chinese purchasing managers’ preferences and trade-offs in supplier selection and performance evaluation. Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 115-124.

[17]De Boer, L. and L. van der Wegen, (2003). Practice and promise of formal supplier selection: a study of four empirical cases. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9, 109-118.

[18]Cui, Z.X. et al., (2011). Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making With Fuzzy Logic and Entropy Based Weighting. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.

[19]Xiangxin, L. et al., (2011). Application of the Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Method in Safety Evaluation of Coal Mines. Proceedia Engineering, 26, 2085-2091.

[20]Lee, M.C. et al., 2011. An Entropy Decision Model for Selection of Enterprise Resource Planning System. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 1-9.

[21]Liao,C.N. and H.P. Kao, (2011). An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 10803–10811.

[22]Shannon, D.E and W.Weaver, (1947). The math Theory of Communication. The University of Illinois press, Urbanna.

[23]De Luca, A. and S. Termini, (1972). A definition of a non-probabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy sets theory, Information and Control, 20, 201-312.

[24]Szmidt, E. and J. Kacprzyk, (2000). Distances between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and System, 114(3), 505-518.

[25]Wu, D. (2009). Intelligent Systems for Decision Support, University of Southern California.

[26]Mendel, J.M., R.I. John, & F.L. Liu, (2006). Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logical Systems Made Simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14(6), 808-821.